Answer: d) Fence sitting.
Explanation:
Fence sitting is the situation were a person is unable to decide between two options present in any argument, questioning, competition etc.This indecisiveness can be due to lack of courage or confusion.
According to the question, fence sitting concept is not applicable on results obtained from research of Dr.Gore as mostly students are able to make decision about the question.Thus, lack of decisiveness is not shown through this scenario.
Other options are incorrect because yea-saying, response set and acquiescence are not the factors that lack to define opting between two or more side in any situation or argument.Thus, the correct option is option(d).
<span>counterbalancing influences by which an organization or system is regulated, typically those ensuring that political power is not concentrated in the hands of individuals or groups. So this means that we would have maybe a monarchy and definitely monopoly's </span><span />
The accurate statements regarding the AIDS epidemic in Africa are the following:
- HIV was first diagnosed in the 1980's. Although the virus was tracked back to 1959, it was during the 1980's when the first patient was diagnosed with the term HIV virus.
- Some people did not seek treatment for HIV because of the social stigma of the disease. A lot of people were afraid of seeking treatment or even getting tested for HIV, in fear that if being affected by it, they would be discriminated and marginalized from society.
- Over half of all HIV/AIDS deaths in the world are in Africa. In 2017, there were 36.9 million people living with HIV in the world. From that number, over 20 million people live in different parts of Africa.
- Civil war and economic problems slowed the response of many African countries. Although there has been a great improvement with the early diagnosis and treatment of the virus in African patients, the economic and social conditions of certain countries have made the response to the virus a slower one.
A.) Rwanda. I can not explain exactly why this took place in Rwanda but they even have a movie on the conflict between the Tutsi and Hutu tribes. Everything in the movie took place in Rwanda.
Mostly likely no. He could've done more. If he had done more there probably wouldn't be a need for the civil rights act of 1964.