Because, of how simple the name is people tend to choose the simpler things in life.
If you need more help message me so you don't use your points!
If you want your dog to sit on command, you may give him a treat every time he sits for you.
Answer: NATURAL LAW.
Explanation: Natural law in philosophy can be said to be an ethical theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by nature and has validity everywhere.
The law of nature is implied to be objective and universal. In essence, it exists independently.
Humans instinct that inclines them to protect themselves from harm can be termed natural law. This is because, this act is VALID for every single human in the world and is OBJECTIVE. Validity and objectivity being the key words of natural laws.
Answer:
Dear eriabn
Answer to your query is provided below
Slave trade was a trade of slaves from Africa. It was between three countries, Africa ,France and America. Slaves were bought from Africa and then packed in ships for three months and later on sold to the plantation owners on the port of baundeax in France. Others were sold in America.
Explanation:
Slavery refers to a system whereby people were ill treated and forced to hard work.
The Europeans were reluctant to go and work in distant and unfamiliar lands meant a shortage of labour on the plantations. So this was met by a triangular slave trade between Europe, Africa and the Americas. The slave trade began in the seventeenth century. French merchants sailed from the ports of Bordeaux or Nantes to the African coast, where they bought slaves from local chieftains. Branded and shackled, the slaves were packed tightly into ships for the three-month long voyage across the Atlantic to the Caribbean. There they were sold to plantation owners. The exploitation of slave labour made it possible to meet the growing demand in European markets for sugar, coffee, and indigo. Port cities like Bordeaux and Nantes owed their economic prosperity to the flourishing slave trade.
The argument recognised as “Meno's Paradox” can be reformulated as follows: If you be aware of what you are searching for, inquiry is unnecessary. If you don't understand what you are searching for, inquiry is impossible. Therefore, inquiry is both unnecessary or impossible.
<h3>What does Socrates say about Meno's paradox?</h3>
Meno's Paradox or Paradox of Inquiry states that “a man can't inquire either about what he knows or about what he does no longer understand – for he can't inquire about what he knows, because he is aware of it, and in that case is in no want of inquiry; nor again can he inquire about what he does not know.
Learn more about Meno's paradox here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/13364091</h3><h3>#SPJ13</h3>
