Hello. Your question is incomplete and this makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, in the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to John Marshall's decision regarding the Marbury v. Madison. If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer and Explanation:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall decided that the national congress does not have absolute power over government decisions, as, like the entire political body in the country, it was subject to the laws covered by the federal constitution. Thus, any act, adopted by Congress, or any other branch of government, that was unconstitutional, that is, that was not approved by any law within the federal constitution, could be revised or completely annulled by the Supreme Court.
What prompted Marshall to decide this was the positioning of the federal constitution as the country's supreme law, which cannot be violated in any way.
The Marbury case v. Madison, occurred when William Marbury, who was appointed as country judge by President John Adams, did not receive the diploma that allowed him to hold office, when James Madison became Secretary of State after President Thomas Jefferson came to power. However, as an appointed judge, Marbury had the right to receive the diploma and Marshall saw the denial of the diploma as an unconstitutional act.
<span>The internet has been gaining ground in the importance of elementary resources of society today, has gained unpredictability and randomness of human interactions, this means that it intervenes in human relationships and interpersonal relationships so that people are more focused on the internet and entertainment that this offers more than relationships with other people.</span>
Answer:
To reduce her dissonance, Rosie is <u>changing a problem cognition to make it more consonant with her behavior.</u>
Explanation:
Social psychology tries to find and explanation of relevant factors that affect people's behavior. In the case given, Rosie tries to justify her lack of interest in a balanced-well-established food diet by saying "<em>Live fast, die young</em>". She accepts that phrase as true in order to excuse the idea that eating junk food is not bad at all for her.
Answer:
It will lead to lack of understanding.
Explanation:
There will never be peace between both people.
Hope it helps, thanks.
Farming Systems in India are strategically utilized, according to the locations where they are most suitable. The farming systems that significantly contribute to the agriculture of India are subsistence farming, organic farming, industrial farming.
Each region in India has a specific soil and climate that is only suitable for certain types of farming. Many regions on the western side of India experience less than 50 cm of rain annually, so the farming systems are restricted to cultivate crops that can withstand drought conditions and farmers are usually restricted to single cropping.
Irrigation farming is when crops are grown with the help of irrigation systems by supplying water to land through rivers, reservoirs, tanks, and wells. Over the last century, the population of India has tripled. With a growing population and increasing demand for food, the necessity of water for agricultural productivity is crucial.
Problems from Irrigation Edit
Because funds and technical expertise were in short supply, many projects moved forward at a slow pace, including The Indira Gandhi Canal project. The central government's transfer of huge amounts of water from Punjab to Haryana and Rajasthan contributed to the civil unrest in Punjab during the 1980s and early 1990s. Problems also have arisen as groundwater supplies used for irrigation face depletion.
Shifting cultivation is a type of subsistence farming where a plot of land is cultivated for a few years until the crop yield declines due to soil exhaustion and the effects of pests and weeds.
you can read and write whatever you want from this
i hope this should help