1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
3 years ago
11

How do you solve questions 6,8 and 10 in the picture?

Mathematics
2 answers:
tester [92]3 years ago
4 0
The answer too #10 is 3
Westkost [7]3 years ago
3 0
The answer to 10 is 3
You might be interested in
A number is first increased by 20 and then doubled. The result is 2 less than 5 times the number.
torisob [31]

Answer:

The number is 14

Step-by-step explanation:

Let n be the number. We can set up an equation:

2(n+20)=5n-2

Distribute the left side

2n+40=5n-2

Move like terms to one side. Note that the sign flips when we move a term from one side to the other.

40+2=5n-2n

42=3n

Divide both sides by 3

n=14

5 0
3 years ago
How many times greater is 46 than 0.46?NO DEVIDING
Inessa [10]
100 because if you move the decimal over two places that is equivalent to multiplying 0.46 by 100
5 0
3 years ago
Sandy and Alex are married, with no dependents. They wish to file a joint tax return. Both of them work, but their combined sala
Nat2105 [25]
The answer is D. 1040-A I just took the test.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many time does 3 go into 20?
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

6 times.

Step-by-step explanation:

6x3=18

20-18=2

hope this helps ! </3 ~ alyssa

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the matrix <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A_%7B4x4%7D%2C%20det%28A%29%20%3D%20-2" id="TexFormula1" title="A_{4x4}, d
Lerok [7]

We found a counterexample, so the statement is false.

<h3>Is the statement true?</h3>

Let's use the matrix:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]

This is a 4x4 matrix with determinant equal to -2.

The inverse matrix is:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1/2&0&0&0\\0&-1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\ 0&0&0&-1 \end{array}\right]

If we multiply it by 2, we get:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&0\\0&-2&0&0\\0&0&-2&0\\ 0&0&0&-2 \end{array}\right]

The adjoint of that is the original matrix, actually:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]

Which we already know, has a determinant of -2.

So the statement is false, as we found a counterexample.

If you want to learn more about matrices:

brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • You can buy 2 DVDs for the same price you would pay for 3 CDs selling for $13.20 a piece.Explain how you could find the price of
    10·1 answer
  • Numbers are (-20,10) and (40,-50)​
    15·1 answer
  • It would be amazing if someone helps
    14·1 answer
  • A N S W E R Q U I C K P L E A S E
    14·1 answer
  • The line segments are translated 2 units to the left to form A'B' and C'D'. Which statement describes A'B' and C'D'? Line segmen
    12·2 answers
  • Please help thank you soooo much
    14·2 answers
  • ⅚–⅓ what is the answer to this fraction ​
    11·2 answers
  • An arithmetic sequence has this recursive formula.
    15·1 answer
  • The sum of two numbers is 200 and the two numbers are in a ratio of 4:6, what is the larger number.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the probability of drawing a red card, replacing it, and then drawing an odd card?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!