I can understand that Orpheus was not certain if he wasn't tricked by Hades, and if Eurydice is really following him. He also wanted to see his beloved. But the punishment for doing so was very severe, and Greek gods were usually not the ones one should trifle with, so i think that his action was reckless. I wouldn't look back, but its easier said then done.
Hello. You forgot to say that this question is about "Secrets in the Stones." You also forgot to show the answer options, the options are:
It suggests that we can never know the purpose of Stonehenge.
It shows that archaeologists are not able to explain the past.
It explains why people are losing interest in the site.
It begins the discussion of different ideas about Stonehenge.
Answer:
It begins the discussion of different ideas about Stonehenge.
Explanation:
The sentence "even though some questions about the site's purpose have been answered, many remain" gives space for a discussion on theories about Stonehenge to be opened, since it is not possible to determine, in fact, the reason why it was created . Thus, we can understand that the author includes this sentence in the article to serve as a hook for the next section of the article, which talks about possible theories about Stonehenge.
Answer:
I think Krakauer interrupted Chris McCandless' story because he wanted everyone to know that Chris is not the only one who had attempted to live off the land and happened to die in the process before returning home.
I find it inspirational. To me, but i believe that answer is opinionated. Hope this helps you.
