Answer:
nature; Nature versus Nurture controversy
Explanation:
Nature versus nurture controversy / debate involves extent to which the particular aspects of the behavior are the product of either inherited or acquired influences.
-
Nature is pre-wiring and nature is influenced by the genetic inheritance and also other biological factors. While, nurture is taken generally as influence of the external factors after the conception.
-
Nature-nurture controversy is concerned with relative contribution which both influences make to the human behavior.
<u>Thus, having red eyes is a factor of nature and such case study is described in the Nature versus Nurture controversy.</u>
Answer: becuse he was the best one no one nos how he won
Explanation:
Answer:John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Explanation:
According to research, a Collectivistic culture as seen in countries like China, Korea, and Japan, is one that characterized by group prioritization above personal interest while Individualistic culture as seen in countries like United States is one characterized by individual's needs before group goals.
Also, Social loafing is a situation where an individual put less effort when working as a group to perform a task to achieve a goal, but may give his best when working solely on the project.
From the definitions above, its likely that an individual with a social loafing mindset may come from an individualistic culture as seen in a country like United States. Therefore, we can infer that John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Base on the behavior of Carlos, the best approach that will
explain the behavior that he has shown would empathy altruism hypothesis. This
is where a person has the ability of feeling empathy in other people and tries
to put themselves in their situation, where in they try to be more
understanding and tries to share the same emotion that the person would feel
because of the situation that he or she is in. It is also with this, it makes a
person help the other party without expecting anything from return and helping
them because he or she wants to and not because he or she is expecting anything
or is only obliged to do it. It is seen from Carlos actions as he helps the
woman who has been begging for alms and tries to put himself into her shoes
where he felt pain into seeing her go through in that situation.