Answer:
(a) $61.11
(b) $54.44
Explanation:
1)
Value of Stock = Benchmark price-sales ratio × Stock's sales
= 5.5 × 1,500,000
= $8,250,000
Thus,
Price of stock = Value of Stock ÷ shares outstanding
= 8,250,000 ÷ 135,000
= $61.11
Thus, I would pay $61.11 for the stock.
2)
Value of Stock = Benchmark price-sales ratio × Stock's sales
= 4.9 × 1,500,000
= $7,350,000
Thus,
Price of stock = Value of Stock ÷ shares outstanding
= $7,350,000 ÷ 135,000
= $54.44
Thus, I would pay $54.44 for the stock.
Answer:
Cost of Failure
Explanation:
A manufacturer incurs failure cost when they produce defective goods. The can be both internal and external cost.
Internal cost are those that incur before the product is sold/shipped to the ultimate buyer such as waste, re-work and/or reduction in sales price for re-worked goods. External cost on the other hand are those that occur following the shipment of goods such as warranty claims, cost of any legal action taken by customer, orders cancelled and/or lost of customer goodwill.
In most cases the external cost is higher than the cost incurred on the internal failure of the goods. So most often the manufacturers are more focused on ensuring that the quality standards are achieved.
Answer:
$27,000
Explanation:
Assuming the minimum cost per day is the same as the penalty for each day the project lasts longer than 27days which is $1,000
Mininum completion cost = 27 × $1,000 = $27,000
Answer:
Sunk costs.
Explanation:
Sunk costs refers to historical funds spent or incurred that cannot be recovered. Such costs are considered irrelevant during decision making which impacts on the business's future as they present no influence on present or future prospects.
Example
ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, money that has been or will be paid regardless of the decision whether to proceed with the project is sunk costs.
In order to implement a cost-leadership strategy effectively, a <span>functional and mechanistic</span> structure is preferred in a firm. The cost leadership strategy in business was developed by Michael Porter regarding competitive advantage. The ultimate goal is to achieve the lowest cost of manufacturing and operating your product within the industry.