The logical fallacy that is being used in the passage is B) overgeneralization.
Although there are some narratives written after 1920 that are characterized by their complexity such as William Faulkner's works,<u> not all literature written after that time is difficult to understand</u>. Furthermore, complexity is not a synonym of a lack of elegance or refinement.
There are flaws in reasoning in this passage due to hasty generalization. Overgeneralization occurs when someone unable to consider the whole panorama generalises from inadequate or insufficient evidence and reaches a rushed conclusion about a certain subject. It is overgeneralization what has lead this passage to become an illogical statement.
Answer:
Im not the best but here we go: For question three: Complex seems like a good answer and for question four: Compound. Good luck! And sorry if im wrong!
Answer:
Whose beautiful ornaments are these?
Explanation:
The possessive nature of a noun is shown by using the word "whose" when asking questions. The word whose" is the possessive form of "who" and is used to ask questions relating to the relationship of a thing or idea with a noun.
In the given question, the noun is "beautiful ornaments". To ask the possessive question of who those beautiful ornaments belong to, we can use "whose" as follows-
<u><em>Whose beautiful ornaments are these?</em></u>
Here, "whose" is the possessive adjective showing possession followed by the noun "beautiful ornaments".
Answer:
My sister <em><u>is</u></em> a teacher. She <em><u>isn't</u></em> a student.
(mistake in question Its She when sister is used)
They are both not likely to be certain would be 100%, likely would be anywhere above 50%, and unlikely would be under 50%
