Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the images below.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in 2 sheets with the formulas indications.
Answer:
21% to 30%
Explanation:
The debt to income ratio indicates the percentage of the earnings that are being used to pay the debts every month. The guidelines for Marines state that when the ratio is less than 15% they have to be careful when taking a loan and when it is from 16% to 20% they should avoid taking more debt. Also, from 21% to 30%, they are overextended and shouldn't take more debt and more than 30% indicates that they have to get help to decrease the debt.
According to this, a Marine might be considered overextended when the debt to income ratio is between 21% to 30%.
Answer:
The weekly production for version A be 100 units
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
The Total aggregate forecast for the year=10,400 units
Number of weeks per year=52 weeks
The weekly production=Total aggregate forecast for the year/ numer of weeks
The weekly production=104,00/52=200 units
Therefore, the weekly production for version A=50%of 200 units
The weekly production for version A=100 units
The weekly production for version A be 100 units
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Self- serving bias is the term which is defined or described as the tendency of people who attribute the positive events to their own character and attribute the negative events to the external factors.
This bias is the common kind of cognitive bias which is extensively studied in the social psychology.
So, in this case, Helena provide the example of the self- serving bias as when she did not reach the goal, then she stated that her failure is due to poor economy which means she attribute the negative event to external factors.
Answer: Yes it does.
Explanation:
The Statute of Frauds holds that there are some contracts including real estate contracts that need to be in written form and then signed to be binding. Some of those contracts include, contracts of sale of goods worth more than $500 as well as contracts that cannot be completed within a year.
We can agree that the trees and top soil are definitely over $500 in value and so this falls under the Statute.
The main bone of contention here however, is probably if the Electronic signature that Hardell used to signed the memorandum entitles the aggrement to legal protection under the Statue of Frauds which requires a signature.
The answer is yes.
The United States Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act is a federal law. A main provision of this Act is to give electronic signatures the same significance as handwritten signatures. This law is meant to apply to wherever US Federal law applies including states, and US territories. States generally have the right to either accept this law or follow a similar one called the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (‘UETA’) which was passed in 1999 and bestows upon Electronic contracts, similar status as paper contracts.
The Electronic signature used by Hardell therefore falls under the Statute of Frauds.
