Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
A) Price 7,080 U
B) Quantity 4,630.5 U
C) Total 11.710,5 U
Explanation:
DIRECT MATERIALS VARIANCES
std cost $3.45
actual cost $3.65
quantity 35,400
difference $(0.20)
price variance $(7,080.00)
std quantity 36110.00
actual quantity 35400.00
std cost $3.45
difference 710.00
quantity variance $2,449.50
Total Variance: 2,449.5 - 7,080 = -4.630,5
Answer:
a. number of returns due to incorrect products shipped in response to orders.
Explanation:
AnaCarolina and Jaco, executive managers at Duke Manufacturing can use the number of returns due to incorrect products shipped in response to orders to determine appropriate performance metrics for the customer perspective of Duke's balanced scorecard.
The defective units in the production line will give a performance metrics with respect to customer's order.
By putting employees in direct contact with customers before implementing the new service program, it is an attempt by XYZ to create urgency for change.
<h3 /><h3>How to implement organizational changes?</h3>
Changes can impact the way work is performed, altering the organizational culture in some cases, which can generate resistance. To reduce this situation, it is essential to implement the changes gradually, with objectivity and clarity about the benefits that will be achieved.
Therefore, organizational changes must be implemented smoothly, in order to provide optimal training and security for the employee.
Find out more about resistence to change here:
brainly.com/question/25997303
Answer:
Publicizing Voting Records and Publishing Research.
Explanation:
As they seek to influence the public opinion and not the government in this question, lobbying would be out as it is a tactic to influence congress members directly and not the public. Publishing voting records could be a valid tactic if said vote records were in favor of the group interest. Funding and publishing research is a valid tactic as well because it serves as a platform to get facts and data to the public, influencing its decision (in the scenario a research findings benefits the interest groups vision, obviously).
