From human perspective...
1. They cant kill you
2. You see them closer up because they cant run away
3. You can see a huge variety of animals from all over the world sll in one place instead of traveling thousands of miles
From animal perspective...
1. Dont have to worry about predators
2. Food is provided without the hassle of hunting
3. If endangered, less likely to go extinct
Answer:
Well, it is a worthless activity unless would be for funny
Explanation:
The evidence to support the usefulness of these activities as anything other than entertainment is virtually non-existent.
Part A's answer would be <em>"the creation of an imaging code that combines large amounts of data into one picture"</em>
Part B's answers are<em> "Her role was to help build an algorithm which could construct the masses of data collected by the telescope into a single image." </em>and <em>"The algorithm would later lead to an image of a supermassive black hole in the Messier 87 galaxy being taken for the first time."</em>
A parliamentary procedure has so many rules so as to carry out its main goal of reaching the best decision without bias.
If motions are brought up and are directly recognized without rules, do you think everything will be deliberated properly?
The organization strictly follow parliamentary procedure in order to reach a group decision with the least conflict. Therefore, everything can be narrowed down to "peace and order".
It's all for peace and order.
