All categories

3 years ago

Pleaseeeeee help with math. i’ve gotten no help today. explantion needed!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Reptile [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Exactly two distinct zeros

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 2(x-1) (x + 4)

Plug y = 0

0 = 2(x-1) (x + 4)

0/2 = (x-1) (x + 4)

(x-1) (x + 4) = 0

(x-1) = 0 or (x + 4)= 0

x = 1 or x = - 4

Here, x has two distinct roots, therefore given quadratic relation has Exactly two distinct zeros.

vodka [1.7K]3 years ago

7 0

Use what is in the parenthesis and make it equal zero. (x-1) means x is 1 because 1-1 is zero :)

You might be interested in

Fiona has $18 to spend. She spent $4.25, including tax, to buy a notebook. She needs to save $9.75, but she wants to buy a snack

Irina18 [472]

1. $18-4,25=13,75 \\ 13,75-9,75=4 \\ 0,50x \leq 4$ <u />⇔ $x= \frac{4}{0,50}$ ⇔ $x= 8$
R: She can buy 8 crackers

2. Amy used 13%
Dan used 0,14*100 = 14%
Mike used 0,5*100 = 50%
R: Mike used the greatest amount of milk.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the value of a^3 in the sequence?

cupoosta [38]

10 is the value coz you add 10 each time you add

4 0

3 years ago

You went to the mall with $80. You spend 25% of the money on shorts and 65% of the remainder on sandals. How much did the sandal

sukhopar [10]

25% of 80

25/100 or 1/4 x 80 = 20

So $20 were spent on shorts, then $60 were left over.

65% of 60 on sandals.

so 65/100 x 60 = 39

So we can see that the sandals cost $39.

7 0

3 years ago

Describe how the graph of the function g(x) = -5x²-2 is related to the graph of

zhenek [66]

Answer:

3 0

2 years ago

The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w

sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

$Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76$

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

$Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -1.96 or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < $Z_{H_0}$ < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

The value of $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

$Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -2.576or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< $Z_{H_0}$ < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago