Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
Here, when the Juice smoothies does not pay Issac, the selling of fruits is an example of mitigation of damages.
Mitigation of damages can be referred as a contract law under which a victim of breach of law can take actions in order to minimize damages. It means to take any reasonable opportunity possible under the given circumstances to minimize or reduce damages. Though taking extreme actions is not required.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Marketing Mix
Explanation:
Marketing Mix is a gathering of promoting factors that the firm joins and controls, to deliver the ideal reaction in the objective market. It is a significant showcasing device that involves every one of the components which impact the interest for the items offered by the firm. Marketing mix helps to build a healthy relationship with the customers.
Answer:
Benefits from related & unrelated diversification.
Explanation:
Firms' benefit(s) from related diversification :
- Building & developing market power - By sharing the related diversification going on in entire industry.
- Sharing activities & market linkages with other businesses - Associated diversification implies forward & backward linkages.
Firms' benefit(s) from unrelated diversification :
- Leveraging & enhancing different core competencies, USP - By Focusing on self paced unique diversification
- Creating a different ostentation brand - Creating a strong brand, capable of becoming a market leader, rather than market follower
Key concepts explaining firm success or failure from either diversification are implicit within above explanation.
Answer:
Economist A
Government spending multiplier $4billion
Tax multiplier $8billion
Economist B
Government spending multiplier $8billion
Tax multiplier $2billion
Explanation:
Computation for the amount the government would have to increase spending to close the output gap according to each economist's belief
ECONOMIST A
Government spending multiplier=16/4
Government spending multiplier=$4billion
Tax multiplier=16/2
Tax multiplier=$8billion
ECONOMIST B
Government spending multiplier=16/2
Government spending multiplier=$8billion
Tax multiplier=16/8
Tax multiplier=$2billion
Therefore the amount the government would have to increase spending to close the output gap according to each economist's belief are :
ECONOMIST A
Government spending multiplier=$4billion
Tax multiplier=$8billion
ECONOMIST B
Government spending multiplier=$8billion
Tax multiplier=$2billion
