Answer:
Today, they might be known as a tribe.
Explanation:
Tribes can be defined as multiband groups of indigenous people who do not live under the control of a centralized state. These groups have their own leaders, and their loyalty is attached to their people, culture, customs etc. They are connected by the belief of having a common ancestor. The bands that compose a tribe may vary from groups of 5 to 80 people, and they can be integrated temporarily or permanently. As we can see, the Maasai fit the definition of a tribe.
Answer : Quota sampling, in some cases, is similar to stratified random sampling. True
Answer:
The answer would be C.
Explanation:
A. wouldn't do anything for Mexico, it would just make more Mexican citizens flea from Mexico.
B. wouldn't work at all because a wall has been proven not to stop anyone.
D. wouldn't work either. Mexico enforcing or not enforcing anti-drug laws has been proven not to change anything. In fact, to compare this so that it makes more sense, guns are completely illegal in Mexico, and Mexican Citizens and Cartels still have so many firearms that are usually illegal in the United States. So what would happen if they even tried to change anything about enforcing fewer or more anti-drug laws?
<u>Main point is that education opportunities in Mexico would make a huge change, especially if it was more politic related because then it would cause another type of revolution to occur, resulting in people wanting to fight for a good cause and a better future for Mexico.</u>
The one that allowed radical republicans to take control of reconstruction policy is :
B. their control of two-thirds of the House and a Senate
By controlling this, thy were also controlling the bill that could be passed by the Government
hope this helps
