Personality theorists who adopt a teleological approach generally believe that people's behavior is a function of <u>people's expectations of future events.</u>
<u />
A subset of behaviorism from a psychological perspective is called teleological behaviorism. It maintains that psychological insights are best derived by the objective observation of externally observable human activities, in accord with the core principles of its branch. Immanuel Kant is the advocate of this strategy.
It is said that rather than focusing on their origins, many events are best understood and explained in terms of their goals. Its supporters in psychology contend that mental processes are purposeful, or oriented toward a specific objective.
To know more about Personality here
brainly.com/question/20164923
#SPJ4
<span>They should listen to the child with full attention when the child talks about the death. <span>Sometimes
adults try to hide the topic or not explain to the children about what
happened, this is a mistake, they must explain to the children about the
death and hear and answer all the doubts they have.
I hope this infor
</span></span>
Answer:
<u>The first step would have been to avoid war with Japan during the Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905. This war cost the Russians two Battleship Fleets and caused the Battleship Potemkin to mutiny in 1905 (Russian Battleship Potemkin was from the only remaining Russian Fleet stationed in the Black Sea); Japanese intelligence staff also financed some of the Bolshevik covert operations which were undermining the Tsar (whom Japan was at war with); including the financing of Lenin himself. Had the Russo-Japanese War not occurred. Russia would have at least survived past WW1. As history records, Tsarist Russia fell in 1917, one year before the end of WW1, which was 1918. The Tsar could have given his people more food and listen to them. He could have gotten out of WW1 earlier. At the same time he could have given more power to the duma.</u>
Explanation:
Because of his inaptitude and inadequate decisions and inability to change with the times he paved the path for revolution. This revolution in 1917 led to the end of his family's dynasty, the end of the autocracy in Russia. Who Was Nicholas II? Nicholas II inherited the throne when his father, Alexander III, died in 1894. Although he believed in an autocracy, he was eventually forced to create an elected legislature. Nicholas II's handling of Bloody Sunday and World War I incensed his subjects and led to his abdication. In March 1917, the army garrison at Petrograd joined striking workers in demanding socialist reforms, and Czar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. In July 1918, the advance of counterrevolutionary forces caused the Yekaterinburg Soviet forces to fear that Nicholas might be rescued. Lenin saw an opportunity to seize power for himself and took it. He returned to Petrograd and convened a meeting of his party on October 10. Lenin then forced through a decision (by 10 votes to 2) to prepare an uprising. According to the official state version of the USSR, former Tsar Nicholas Romanov, along with members of his family and retinue, was executed by firing squad, by order of the Ural Regional Soviet, due to the threat of the city being occupied by Whites (Czechoslovak Legion).
James Madison addressed the needs for a stronger
constitution. He believed what was need
was a constitution that could effectively rule the colonies that includes both
the majority and minority with fairness. This way there would be more control
and the government had more strength rather than letting states’ rights
prevail.
<span>This is false. These types of tests are better known as integrity tests. They are used to determine the ethical and moral backgrounds of the people they are measuring. These tests are also able to determine future behaviors regarding people placed in positions of power and authority and any negative actions that might occur while in this position.</span>
