Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
Please kindly check attachment for the step by step solution of the given problem.
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
<span>pb(no3)2 + 2 nacl → pbcl2 + 2nano3</span>
Answer:
15 protons
8 electrons in valence shell after accepting 3 electrons
Neutral/no charge before accepting 3 electrons
-3 charge after accepting 3 electrons
<span>Dalton's atomic theory proposed that all matter was composed of atoms, indivisible and indestructible building blocks. While all atoms of an element were identical, different elements had atoms of differing size and mass. Dalton also stated that all compounds were composed of combinations of these atoms in defined ratios. He postulated that chemical reactions resulted in the rearrangement of the reacting atom.
</span>
