Answer:
Option A is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- This is indeed a connection to compulsory tax and government expense stabilizers which weren't at the discretion including its government. Throughout the event of a recession, expenses are cut, rising discretionary income to something like the extent that the economic depression is pacified.
- Unemployment insurance, as well as other social programs, are consequently expanded without the clear intervention of the government
The other options offered are also not relevant to the scenario presented. So, the solution above is the right one.
Answer:
B) 0.7; inelastic
Explanation:
The computation of the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is shown below:
Elasticity is
= [(Sales - prior sales) ÷ ( Sales + prior sales) ÷ 2] ÷ [(price - dropped price) ÷ (price - dropped price) ÷ 2
= [(1,040,000 - 890,000) ÷ (1,040,000 + 890,000) ÷ 2] ÷ [(25,000 - 20,000) ÷ (25,000 + 20,000) ÷ 2]
= (150,000 ÷ 965,000) ÷ (5,000 ÷ 22,500)
= 0.15 ÷ 0.22
= 0.7
It is less than one so the demand is inelastic
Answer:
<u>B. shows planned purchase rates of goods and services at various price levels.</u>
Explanation:
- The aggregate demand is the total demand for final goods and services in the economy over a given period of time. And is often distinguished as the effective demand curve. That is the demand for the GDP of the nation.
- As it specifies all the goods and the services that are to be purchased at all the possible levels. Hence this demand curve shows us the real output given on the horizontal axis. Thus the curve shows the quantity of the output that is demanded and the aggregate of the all price level.
It would help keep the person organized
