1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
steposvetlana [31]
3 years ago
13

Dividing Partnership Net Loss Leigh Meadows and Byron Leef formed a partnership in which the partnership agreement provided for

salary allowances of $51,000 and $45,000, respectively. Determine the division of a $26,000 net loss for the current year, assuming remaining income or losses are shared equally by the two partners. Use the minus sign to indicate any deductions or deficiencies. Leigh Meadows Byron Leef Total Salary Allowance $ 51,000 $ 45,000 $ 96,000 Remainder $ $ $ Net Loss $ $ $
Business
1 answer:
Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Byron net loss=$12,187.50

Meadows net loss=(0.53125×26,000)=$13,812.50

Explanation:

<em>Step 1: Determine total amount contributed by both partners</em>

Meadows=$51,000

Byron=$45,000

Total amount contributed by both=Amount contributed by Meadows+Amount contributed by Byron

where;

Amount contributed by Meadows=$51,000

Amount contributed by Byron=$45,000

Substituting;

Total amount contributed by both=(51,000+45,000)=$96,000

Total amount contributed by both=$96,000

<em>Step 2: Determine proportionate amount contributed by each partner</em>

Proportion contributed by Meadows=Amount contributed by Meadows/Total amount contributed by both

where;

Amount contributed by Meadows=$51,000

Total amount contributed by both=$96,000

Substituting;

Proportion contributed by Meadows=(51,000/96,000)=0.53125

Proportion contributed by Byron=Amount contributed by Byron/Total amount contributed by both

where;

Amount contributed by Byron=$45,000

Total amount contributed by both=$96,000

Substituting;

Proportion contributed by Byron=(45,000/96,000)=0.46875

<em>Step 3: Determine proportionate division of net loss</em>

Proportion division to Byron=(0.46875×26,000)=$12,187.50

Proportion division to Meadows=(0.53125×26,000)=$13,812.50

You might be interested in
Calculate the risk-adjusted asset base for a bank with: a. Cash of $20 million, 0% b. Gen. Obligation municipal security of $100
Ulleksa [173]
This is what i found  Answer 1
Risk-Adjusted Asset Base
The calculation of the risk-adjusted asset base for a bank is as below-
Risk-adjusted asset = (Cash × 0%) + (municipal security × 20%) + (home mortgages × 50%) + (Commercial loans × 100%)
= (20 × 0%) + (100 × 20%) + (500 × 50%) + (300$ × 100%)
= 0 + 20 + 250 + 300
= $570 million
The outcome shows that the risk-adjusted or weighted asset based for the bank will be $570 million.
Tier1 and Tier 2 Capital:
If the bank has no off-balance sheet activity then minimum required level of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital will be-
Tier 1 capital = Risk-weighted asset × 4%
= $570 × 4%
= $22.8 million
Tier 2 capital = Maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted asset
= $570 × 1.25%
= $7.125 million
Total capital = $22.8 + $7.125 => $29.925 million
The outcomes indicate that the minimum required level of Tier1 and Tier 2 capital is $22.8 million and $7.125 million for the bank.
Bank Comply with Capital Requirements:
If the bank has Tier 1 capital of $25 million and Tier 2 capital of $15 million then it will comply with its capital requirements of $29.925 million. It is because in this situation, total capital of bank is $37 million that is higher than the above calculated capital of $29.925 million.
Impact of off-Balance Sheet Activities on Capital Requirements
The addition of off-balance sheet activities might increase the capital requirement of the bank. It is because an off-balance sheet items is a financial contract that can create credit loss for the company due to credit risk. So, in case of adding off-balance sheet activities, a bank will require more capital to cover credit loss. Along with this, it can also increase the minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets from 8% and in that situation; the bank will need more capital (Carmichael & Graham, 2012).
Answer 2
Probability of Repayment and Risk Premium
A).
If the rate on a one-year treasury bill is 6% and in case of loan default, no payments are expected on financial securities then the probability of repayment and the risk premium on 1 year AA-rated loan yielding 9 percent will be-
Probability of Repayment:
The following formula can be useful to determine probability of repayment.
P = (1 + I) / (1 + k)
Where,
I = 6%
k = 9%
Then, ...you have $2.19 left :D
 
4 0
3 years ago
Suppose that output (Y ) in an economy is given by the following aggregate production function: Yt = Kt + Nt where Kt is capital
shusha [124]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Yt = Kt + Nt

Taking output per worker, we divide by Nt

Yt/Nt = Kt/Nt + 1

yt = kt + 1

where yt is output per worker and kt is capital per worker.

a) With population being constant, savings rate s and depreciation rate δ.

ΔKt = It - δKt

dividing by Nt, we get

ΔKt/Nt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt ..... [1]

for kt = Kt/Nt, taking derivative

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt ... since Nt is a constant, we have

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt = (dKt/dt)/Nt = ΔKt/Nt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt = it - δkt

thus, Capital accumulation Δkt = i – δkt

In steady state, Δkt = 0

That is I – δkt = 0

S = I means that I = s.yt

Thus, s.yt – δkt = 0

Then kt* = s/δ(yt) = s(kt+1)/(δ )

kt*= skt/(δ) + s/(δ)

kt* - skt*/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*(1- s/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*((δ - s)/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*(δ-s)) = s

kt* = s/(δ -s)

capital per worker is given by kt*

b) with population growth rate of n,

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt =

= \frac{\frac{dKt}{dt}Nt - \frac{dNt}{dt}Kt}{N^{2}t}

= \frac{dKt/dt}{Nt} - \frac{dNt/dt}{Nt}.\frac{Kt}{Nt}

= ΔKt/Nt - n.kt

because (dNt/dt)/Nt = growth rate of population = n and Kt/Nt = kt (capital per worker)

so, d(kt)/dt = ΔKt/Nt - n.kt

Δkt = ΔKt/Nt - n.kt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt - n.kt ......(from [1])

Δkt = it - δkt - n.kt

at steady state Δkt = it - δkt - n.kt = 0

s.yt - (δ + n)kt = 0........... since it = s.yt

kt* = s.yt/(δ + n) =s(kt+1)/(δ + n)

kt*= skt/(δ + n) + s/(δ + n)

kt* - skt*/(δ + n) = s/(δ + n)

kt*(1- s/(δ + n)) = s/(δ + n)

kt*((δ + n - s)/(δ + n)) = s/(δ + n)

kt*(δ + n -s)) = s

kt* = s/(δ + n -s)

.... is the steady state level of capital per worker with population growth rate of n.

3. a) capital per worker. in steady state Δkt = 0 therefore, growth rate of kt is zero

b) output per worker, yt = kt + 1

g(yt) = g(kt) = 0

since capital per worker is not growing, output per worker also does not grow.

c)capital.

kt* = s/(δ + n -s)

Kt*/Nt = s/(δ + n -s)

Kt* = sNt/(δ + n -s)

taking derivative with respect to t.

d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s). dNt/dt

(dNt/dt)/N =n (population growth rate)

so dNt/dt = n.Nt

d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt

dividing by Kt*

(d(Kt*)/dt)/Kt* = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt/Kt* = sn/(δ + n -s). (Nt/Kt)

\frac{sn}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{Nt}{Kt}

using K/N = k

\frac{s}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{n}{kt}

plugging the value of kt*

\frac{sn}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{(\delta + n -s)}{s}

n

thus, Capital K grows at rate n

d) Yt = Kt + Nt

dYt/dt = dKt/dt + dNt/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt + n.Nt

using d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt from previous part and that (dNt/dt)/N =n

dYt/dt = n.Nt(s/(δ + n -s) + 1) = n.Nt(s+ δ + n -s)/(δ + n -s) = n.Nt((δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

dYt/dt = n.Nt((δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

dividing by Yt

g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s).Nt/Yt

since Yt/Nt = yt

g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) (1/yt)

at kt* = s/(δ + n -s), yt* = kt* + 1

so yt* = s/(δ + n -s) + 1 = (s + δ + n -s)/(δ + n -s) = (δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

thus, g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) (1/yt) =  n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) ((δ + n -s)/(δ + n)) = n

therefore, in steady state Yt grows at rate n.

5 0
3 years ago
Typically, the government limits the quantity of a good that can be bought and sold by: setting a price floor below the equilibr
natka813 [3]

Answer:

Setting a price floor below the equilibrium price.

Explanation:

To begin with, it is essential to understand some key concepts:

1. Price floor - can be regarded as the least price that can be established for a category of products in the market.

2. Price Ceiling, on the other hand, can be regarded as the price cap to ensure price of a commodity does not rise above a certain level.

Essentially, price floor and price ceiling are two elements of price control.

Equilibrium price can be regarded as price at which quantity demanded equals quantity supplied.

Equilibrium price is thus the optimum and best combination of demand and supply that could give an optimum return. Any price short of the equilibrium price is often at the risk of the seller.

Thus, setting a price floor below the equilibrium price is tantamount to reducing the interest of the seller in selling such products. Ultimately, this reduces the amount of goods available in the market, while the demand will be enormous, owing to the lower price floor. The implication is that the quantity that can be bought or sold has been effectively curtailed by the government.

On the other hand, setting price ceiling above the equilibrium price would not achieve the objective of the government. This would only ensure the flooding of commodities in the market, effectively dwarfing the quantity demanded. This is away from the objective of the government as implied in this given question.

7 0
3 years ago
Q 8.17: The financial statements of the Larson Company report net sales of $1,000,000 and accounts receivable of $80,000 and $60
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

25.55 days

Explanation:

first we must calculate the accounts receivable turnover ratio = net sales / average accounts receivable

net sales = $1,000,000

average accounts receivable ($80,000 + $60,000) / 2 = $70,000

accounts receivable turnover ratio = $1,000,000 / $70,000 = 14.286

average collection period = 365 days / accounts receivable turnover ratio = 365 / 14.286 = 25.55 days

8 0
3 years ago
A company creates 40 units of a product using 30 hours of labor and 15 sheets of paper. Labor costs $10/ hour and paper costs $5
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

0.038 units per $ of factor costs

Explanation:

Labor cost for 40 units  = 30 hours × $10/hour = $300

Cost of paper for 40 units = 15 sheets × $50/sheet = $750

Output = 40 units

Multi factor productivity is expressed as;

Multi factor productivity = Output/Total Factor cost

Multi factor productivity = 40 units/$1050 = 0.038 units per $ of factor cost

Multi factor productivity is a measure that depicts units produced for every $ of factor products used. In the above case 2 factors i.e labor and paper are used.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A firms supply curve is equal to _________________ above the minimum point on the ________________curve. Select the correct answ
    13·1 answer
  • Grossman and krueger’s study revealed the relationship between pollution levels and income. Which pollutant was the exception to
    6·1 answer
  • In how many cities are Federal Reserve district banks located? 4 12 50 8
    6·2 answers
  • Upon graduating from UCI, you start a job in finance earning $72,000 per year and decide to buy a home. You can afford to pay no
    15·1 answer
  • considered the first and lowest level of stocks. common stock 2. probably the safest investment; corporations can withstand a do
    11·1 answer
  • A company excludes from the current assets section, the amount of cash restricted for purposes other than payment of current obl
    14·1 answer
  • The GDP price index in the United States in 2016 was about 106 ​, and real GDP in 2016 was ​$17.7 trillion​ (2012 dollars). The
    13·1 answer
  • Advanced Products Corporation has supplied the following data from its activity-based costing system:
    13·1 answer
  • Julianna works in an on-the-job training program under the supervision of an experienced Electrical Power-Line
    6·1 answer
  • Why does Publix expect you to bag with two hands
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!