To prove frauds, we need to show that <span>The innocent party relied on the wrongdoer's representation.
If the accused in fraud case represent true representation despite the negative effect that experienced by the accuser than the court will rule that the accuser just make a really bad business decision rather than being scammed.</span>
The answer is c. I am pretty sure. make my answer the brainliest!
Answer:
Accountabillity to the law
Explanation:
because it explains " to hold the offical responsible for violating the law"
Answer:
Honestly, i would say in-n-out, no chili cheese fries
Explanation: