Answer: Take help of neutral third party for investigating for sexual harassment claims.
Explanation:
Sexual harassment claims and case at work place and organization occurs wen any mistreatment , offerings, task, etc is based on sexual terms .Employee can be treated of getting fired or adverse effect if they do not fulfill or cooperate such sexual favors in work environment, which is illegal act and punishable crime.
According to the question,for investigation of sexual harassment activity, manager should hire a neutral third party for investigation. Claim for asking sexual favors by treating demotion can get clarified in this way.
Nevertheless, to-day, as at the start, the purpose of the Standard Oil Company is the purpose of the South Improvement Company — the regulation of the price of crude and refined oil by the control of the output; and the chief <span>means for sustaining this purpose is still that of the original scheme — a control of oil transportation giving special privileges in rates.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
I believe D but there is a chance im wrong.. sorry if I am
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.
Answer:
justtttt because eeeeeeeeeeeeee
