Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1. Inventory $1,800
Accounts Payable $1,800
(Being purchased on account)
2. Inventory $50
To Cash $50
(being freight paid)
3. Accounts Payable $51
To Inventory $51
(being the returned calculator is recorded)
4. Accounts Receivable $670
To Sales Revenues $670
(Being sales is recorded)
5. Cost of Goods Sold $460
To Inventory $460
(Being cost of goods sold is recorded)
6. Sales returns $40
To Accounts Receivable $40
(being sales return is recorded)
7. Inventory $28.20
To Cost of Goods Sold $28.20
(Being cost return is recorded)
8. Accounts Receivable $780
To Sales Revenues $780
(Being the sales is recorded)
9. Cost of Goods Sold $560
To Inventory $560
(Being the cost of goods sold is recorded)
Answer:
bureaucratic control
Explanation:
Bureaucratic control is a management style that tries to control the behavior and performance of the employees through reward or price mechanisms.
In order to achieve its purpose, bureaucratic style managers use a system of standardized rules, processes and verification procedures.
Answer:
B. $0.02
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Since the annual holding cost percentage is 10% and the cost of production is $5. So, the holding cost would be
= $5 × 10%
= 0.5
Now if the t-shirts run 25 times a year, so the holding cost would be
= 0.5 ÷ 25 times
= $0.02
Simply we compute the holding cost based on number of times the t-shirt turns in a year
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
A change in the real money supply can result either from change in the nominal money supply through Federal Reserve policy ( holding the price level constant) or from a change in the price level( holding the nominal money supply constant).The change in the nominal money supply causes a shift of the aggregate demand curve, whereas a change in the price level causes a movement along the aggregate demand curve.
Explanation:
Answer: B) Correct Incorrect
Explanation:
Whilst it was generally believed at some point that raising taxes and Government Spending by the same amount would have no effect, research has disproven this thought.
This is because it was shown that an increase in Government Spending leads to a larger increase in GDP than an increase in taxes reduces it.
This is because when the Government spends money, the Multiplier effect of Government Spending is always 1 more than that of the Taxes therefore raising taxes and spending by the same amounts still increases the Real GDP because Government Spending will create more income than taxes will take.
Necco is right, Packard is wrong.
