Answer:
Amount paid in host country will be = Income * Tax rate in host country = $100,000*25% = $25,000
Amount paid in US will be Income * Tax rate in US - Tax paid in host country (Since the tax rate in host country is lower than USA) = $100,000*35% - $25,000 = $35,000 - $25,000 = $10,000
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option B) decrease.
Explanation:
Regressive tax is that of tax which is imposed in such manner that when the income level in the economy increases , the average tax rate would decrease. This type of tax has heavy burden on the low income people as it takes high proportion of their income. So it can be said here that there is an inverse relationship between tax payer's ability to pay ( which can be measured in income , assets or consumption) and the tax rates imposed.
Answer:
The three primary characteristics of perfect competition are (1) no company holds a substantial market share, (2) the industry output is standardized, and (3) there is freedom of entry and exit. The efficient market equilibrium in a perfect competition is where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
Answer:
Jasmine recognize $1,940 this year if she uses the accrual method of accounting.
Explanation:
The Accrual or Matching Concept in accounting requires revenues and expenses to be recorded in the period i which they occur or incur.
The entry to record the receipt of payment is :
Cash $15,520 (debit)
Unearned Rental Income $15,520 (credit)
By the end of the year on 31 December, 4 months rent income starting September will have been earned and entries are as follows :
Unearned Rental Income $1,940 (debit)
Rental Income $1,940 (credit)
Rental Income calculation = $15,520 × 4 / 32
= $1,940
Answer: c. The new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours
Explanation:
Upon review of the effectiveness of a strategic business decision using evidence-based analytics, business leaders may reverse course.
The factor that led to the reversal of the new scheduling system is that the new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours.
