Answer:
The management can make Elena a loyalty card holder or loyalty program member.
Explanation:
A customer loyalty program refers to a kind of reward program offered by a company to it's those customers who frequently purchase it's products or avail it's services.
Usually, under such loyalty programs, a customer is provided with a loyalty card, wherein for each purchases he/she makes, some loyalty points are earned. These loyalty points can collectively be redeemed later on, in the form of discounts.
So, in the current case, since elena is a frequent buyer of coffee on routine basis, the management can include her in their customer loyalty program and provide her with a loyalty card.
Such card will provide her with rewards and would make her feel privileged, strengthen her bond of loyalty with cuppo' coffee and may lead to increased customer share.
Answer:
Reduce the amount of media violence.
Explanation:
Reducing crime reducing situational stains is the method to minimize the impact of crime and being it public. Media is the most effective way which reports details of crime very quickly. Agnew and Brezina had tried to reduce the impact of crime and avoid distribution of details to public about the reported crime to reduce situational stains.
General Mills sold three
sizes of cereal cheerios at $2.99, $3.99, and $4.49 each. Selling
tactic used by the company is psychology pricing. General Mills used this
technique to
encourage customers to respond on emotional levels rather than logical ones.
<span>Setting
the price of the cereal at $2.99 is proven to attract more consumers than setting
it at $3.00, even though the difference is only $.01. Consumers are said to put
more attention on the first number on a price tag than the last. </span>
Answer:
-$414,444.44
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
Net present value = Initial investment + net cash flows ÷ (required rate of return - projected growth rate)
= -$1,570,000 + $104,000 ÷ (12% - 3%)
= -$1,570,000 + $1,155,555.56
= -$414,444.44
Hence, the net present value is -$414,444.44
Since the net present value comes in negative so the project is rejected
It is much easier to increase government spending, because it gives a temporary boost, whereas decreasing it would take away the benefits you had before, and might mess up other "things" that relied on that part you just removed to decrease government spending.
