Answer:
The correct answer is $21,522.04.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Present value = $10,000
Rate of interest = 11%
Rate of interest (r) ( compounded monthly) = 11% ÷ 12 = 0.00916
time period = 7 years
Time period ( compounded monthly) (t) = 7 × 12 = 84
So, we can calculate the future value by using following method:
FV = PV × ( 1 + r)^t
By putting the value, we get,
FV = $10,000 × ( 1 + 0.00916)^84
FV = $21,522.04
Answer:
D) The actions the Federal Reserve takes to manage the money supply and interest rates.
Explanation:
The Federal Reserve System (FED) is an autonomous government entity of the United States of America that functions like a central bank. Its main responsibilities are to manage the nation's money supply (the total amount of money in the economy) and establish federal interest rates (interest yielded by T-bills, T-notes and T-bonds).
Answer:
Financial leverage
Explanation:
Financial leverage is defined as the use of borrowed funds to perform a business activity or investment that is expected to have higher returns than the cost of borrowing the money (interest).
When a company is looking for funds for its activities there are 3 options they can use: equity, debt, or lease.
Use of equity is the only option where no extra cost is incurred for use of funds.
When using debt or lease cost of use is incurred. The business will need to engage in an activity that will give it revenue above cost of debt.
This practice is called use of financial leverage.
Answer:
concentration targeting strategy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Tennot Inc. most likely uses a concentration targeting strategy. This is a type of strategy in which the company focuses a single specific market segment to put all their efforts into. Which in this scenario Tennot is focusing on the old car market segment and targeting low income customers with these cars.
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
