Answer:
Okay I think the question is already answered
Answer:
Evolutionary biology illustrates both the pattern and processes. The processes of evolution are natural selection and other mechanisms, which modifies the genetic structure of the populations. These processes result in evolutionary patterns, that is, the products generated by evolution with time.
Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a species or a group of species. In order to redevelop phylogeny, the scientists use systematics, that is, an analytical method to categorize the diversity and finding the evolutionary associations between the extinct and the living species.
The evidence used to redevelop phylogenies can be attained from the fossil record and from the biochemical, morphological, and genetic similarities between the species. The scientists are functioning to develop a universal tree of all life, which will get refined with the gathering of new information.
Answer:
A. ponds are shallower than lakes
Explanation:
Ponds are not larger than lakes.
Pond water may move more than lakes in some situations, but it is not a defininte.
Lakes don't always have more vegetation than ponds.
Answer:
The flow of individuals in and out of a population introduces new alleles and increases genetic variation within that population.
Explanation:
Answer:
Transparency is the <u><em>opacity of the atmosphere</em></u>, or how clear it is. Moisture and humidity lower the transparency, as does smoke or other kinds of pollution. It’s not entirely unlike light pollution in that it washes out the fainter details of astronomical targets. In fact, poor transparency typically makes light pollution worse because it scatters the light around instead of letting it escape into space away from your cameras and optics.
Transparency usually gets better with altitude, because you're looking through less air. That's why high altitudes are prized for observatories and star parties.
Transparency is also usually very good after a rainstorm has come through to clear all of the particulates out of the air. This is reason number one I figured my second friend had it right at the star party.
Seeing, on the other hand, is a measure of <u><em>atmospheric turbulence</em></u>. We know that if we take a photo of a fast-moving subject, such as at a sporting event, with a low shutter speed, we'll get a blurry image. So what happens when you have to take a very long dark-sky photo and the stars are jumping all about due to atmospheric turbulence? That’s right, blurry stars and deep sky objects.
Seeing is typically better in places where the geography is very flat. The air masses moving over the land encounter few obstacles and flow more smoothly (sometimes called a laminar flow). In Florida, the winds coming over the mountains gets all mixed up like a creek flowing over big boulders, which makes for terrible seeing.
HOPE IT HELPS
