Answer:
Priority programming is a process programming method based on priority. In this technique, the developer chooses the tasks to work according to priority, which is different from other types of programming, for example, a simple round-robin.
On UNIX and many other systems, higher priority values represent lower priority processes. Some of the systems, such as Windows, use the opposite convention: a higher number means a higher priority
Explanation:
Priorities can be dynamic or static. Static priorities are assigned during creation, while dynamic priorities are assigned according to the behavior of the processes while they are in the system. To illustrate, the planner could favor intensive input / output (I / O) tasks, allowing expensive requests to be issued as soon as possible.
Priorities can be defined internally or externally. Internally defined priorities make use of a measurable amount to calculate the priority of a given process. On the contrary, external priorities are defined using criteria beyond the operating system (OS), which may include the importance of the process, the type and sum of the resources used for the use of the computer, user preferences , trade and other factors such as politics etc.
Assume that there are no fixed costs and ac = mc = $200. at the profit-maximizing output and price for a monopolist, the producer surplus is $3200.
The government provides public services such as railroads. They are therefore the monopoly as no new partners or private companies are allowed to operate the railways. A monopoly is an individual, group, or company that controls a market for goods or services.
A monopolist is a person, group, or company that controls and controls the market for a particular good or service. This lack of competition and lack of alternative goods or services means that monopolists have enough power to charge high prices in the market.
Learn more about monopolists at
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ1
Answer:
Lack of efficiency.
Explanation:
As Trent Automobiles Inc. was expecting a large shipment of scrap metal and due to the fact that it could not arrive on time, the only way to compensate the loss was to make an urgent order for same quantity of scrap metal from a local manufacturer, which led the company to compromise on the quality. If proper track was kept and all the upcoming scenarios had been calculated before hand with a ready substitute raw materials before hand, this would have been not the result. Thus, this indicates a complete lack of efficiency from the side of management of the company.
To chose the right career that fits you
