Answer:
The President has used his role as commander-in-chief to initiate military actions, but not war.
Explanation:
The difference between a military action or intervention and war is diffuse and subject of debate among constitutional scholars. It seems that if the president sends military abroad without approval of Congress, then, it is a military intervention, and if the president does the same with approval of Congress (as it happened in World War II, the last time Congress declared war), then, it is war.
Therefore, the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and most recently, Libya and Syria interventions are not legally considered war, but military interventions.
Answer:
The reasons of the rise of nativism in the 1920s and 19030s were the increase of immigrants, the call of the citizens arguing the loss of access to opportunities and the bigger difficulties they suffered due to the competitive environment.
<span>it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet, and it attempted to regulate indecent speech, which is protected.</span>
This question is weird...The Africans were slaves. So they provided slavery between American colonies, European colonies and the Caribbean
