1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zanzabum
3 years ago
13

As america entered the nineteenth century, some protestant denominations preached that america should turn away from the "nation

al sins" of slavery and alcohol, while other denominations encouraged individuals to confess their personal sins in public.identify the denominations that emphasize either national sins or public confession.
History
1 answer:
Assoli18 [71]3 years ago
6 0
In America, we have very many different denominations. For example, we have the Catholics and the protestant but they were termed as the ones who occupy a large number in America.
Some of the Protestant denomination who emphasized on national sin were Presbyterian and Congregationalist.
That protestant denomination preached emphasizing on personal public confession were Baptist and  Methodists.
You might be interested in
How did Lebanon contribute to the industrial revolution?
Readme [11.4K]

Answer: Historians have identified several causes for the Industrial Revolution, including: the emergence of capitalism, European imperialism, efforts to mine coal, and the effects of the Agricultural Revolution. Capitalism was a central component necessary for the rise of industrialization.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Define the history word illuminate
Alex787 [66]

c. 1500, "to light up, shine on," a back-formation from illumination or else from Latin illuminatus, past participle of illuminare "light up, make light, illuminate." Earlier was enlumyen

5 0
3 years ago
What caused blacks to pursue civil rights more vigorously after world war ii
raketka [301]
despite services in the military African Americans returned to find that Jim crow's laws were still in place
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP<br> What invention ended the “open range” in the late 1800s
nadezda [96]

Answer: The introduction of barbed wire prevented cattle from walking freely across the plains as they had done in the first half of the 1800s.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The difference between a serf and a slave was that serfs were tied to the land and could not be sold without the land.
    12·1 answer
  • what factors lead to a civilization growth, and how might environmental determinism influence these factors
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the early history of euthanasia?
    6·1 answer
  • Answer some questions and I’ll mark brainliest ~~~
    14·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Court case ended segregation in public schools?
    15·2 answers
  • Which two people were of the same US political party between 1796 and 1801
    6·2 answers
  • The family line of Jesus is established in Isaiah. True False
    14·1 answer
  • Backcountry South Carolinians didn’t choose either the patriot or loyalist side originally because?
    6·1 answer
  • 62 POINTS Why are some citizens and leaders reluctant to take in refugees from predominantly Muslim countries? IN writing.
    13·2 answers
  • PLS HELP ME ANSWER THIS !!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!