A
<span>Society and government corrupt the individual.
</span>
Answer:
by influencing how the reader feels by describing what happened
Explanation:
An author can provide more details to the reader by describing, within his narrative, in a detailed way the factors and elements that led a given situation to happen, or how that situation happened. With this the author provides a description, literally, detailed about an important point in his narrative. This allows the reader to have a full understanding of what is happening in the narrative, triggering emotions and feelings related to the details that the author provided.
Answer:
JUST WROTE THIS, IT IS A WHOLE 5 PARADRAPH ESSAY, WITH AT LEAST 5 SENTENCES PER PAREGRAGH. CORRECT GRAMER, SPELLING AND PUNCTUATION:) I WOULD READ THROUGH IT JUST IN CASE THOUGH:-\ BRAINLIEST IS REQUIERD:-) AS WELL AS THANKING AND NO LESS THAN 5 STARS :-) ^-^ "-" ^-^(-:
Both novels The Dark Game and The Coded Book are both similar and different in many ways. They are books that cover accounts of spies during a war. They are very different styles of writing that will be compared and contrasted in this essay. The novels, The Dark Game and The Code Book both reveal information about the life of spies and the history of espionage, though they present the information using very different styles and tone.
The Code Book and The Dark Game are similar in many ways, one being that both explore code breaking. This was a very difficult process but also very necessary for the victory that the US took from the two wars that these books focus on. Another similarity that these books have is that they are both non fiction books. All though they are written with very separate styles both books use true and actual events. Lastly they both explore historical events during a war. As just mentioned both books use real historical events that did take place during their war. As seen above both The code Book and The Dark Game have many similarities, but they also have many differences.
One of the first major differences between both books is that they are written with completely different styles of writing. The book The Dark Game is a narrative story. A narrative story is a story that Is written to engage the reader more and this is done by using things like dialogue and drama. The dark game used a very vivid description of events to try to dramatize it more. And it has a conversational tone unlike The Code Book, that attempts to make the reading more like the story. The Dark Game is a narrative story that is written more like a story. But how is The Code Book Written?
The Code Book Is written as an expository story. This means that it’s main focus is to inform rather than entertain. The Code Book had lots of dense details that are just there to solely teach the reader. This is obviously much different compared to The Dark Game in the sense that one The Code Book wants to inform and The dark game wants to entertain, but also remember that despite the more story feeling that The Dark Game portrays it is still a Very factual book. The Code Book also had a more scientific\ jargon tone to it. This means that it is more professional in some aspects and that it is very point by point event by event type book. The Code book Is an expository story that is written with a purpose to inform not to entertain.
Though very different book's both effectively get their style of writing across. The Dark Game Is a Narrative story that is there to teach the reader about true historical events and is also trying to entertain them at the time. The code book is an expository that's only purpose is to teach\ inform the reader about true historical events. The Code Book and The Dark Game both are historical novels that although are written with different tone and style both are historical details from an war. The books are very similar and different in many ways and in the end it is up to the reader to choose what experience they want to have like learning about spies.
Frost claims that he wrote this poem about his friend Edward Thomas, with whom he had walked many times in the woods near London. Frost has said that while walking they would come to different paths and after choosing one, Thomas would always fret wondering what they might have missed by not taking the other path.
About the poem, Frost asserted, "You have to be careful of that one; it's a tricky poem - very tricky." And he is, of course, correct. The poem has been and continues to be used as an inspirational poem, one that to the undiscerning eye seems to be encouraging self-reliance, not following where others have led.
But a close reading of the poem proves otherwise. It does not moralize about choice, it simply says that choice is inevitable but you never know what your choice will mean until you have lived it.
First Stanza – Describes Situation
The poem consists of four stanzas. In the first stanza, the speaker describes his position. He has been out walking the woods and comes to two roads, and he stands looking as far down each one as he can see. He would like to try out both, but doubts he could to that, so therefore he continues to look down the roads for a long time trying to make his decision about which road to take.
Second Stanza – Decides to Take Less-Traveled Road
He had looked down the first one “to where it bent in the undergrowth,” and in the second stanza, he reports that he decided to take the other path, because it seemed to have less traffic than the first. But then he goes on to say that they actually were very similarly worn. The second one that he took seems less traveled, but as he thinks about it, he realizes that they were “really about the same.” Not exactly that same but only “about the same.”
Third Stanza – Continue Description of Roads
The third stanza continues with the cogitation about the possible differences between the two roads. He had noticed that the leaves were both fresh fallen on them both and had not been walked on, but then again claims that maybe he would come back and also walk the first one sometime, but he doubted he would be able to, because in life one thing leads to another and time is short.
Fourth Stanza – Two Tricky Words
The fourth stanza holds the key to the trickiness of the poem:
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
Those who interpret this poem as suggesting non-conformity take the word “difference” to be a positive difference. But there is nothing in the poem that suggests that this difference signals a positive outcome. The speaker could not offer such information, because he has not lived the “difference” yet.
The other word that leads non-discerning readers astray is the word “sigh.” By taking “difference” to mean a positive difference, they think that the sigh is one of nostalgic relief; however, a sigh can also mean regret. There is the “oh, dear” kind of sigh, but also the “what a relief” kind of sigh. Which one is it? We do not know. If it is the relief sigh, then the difference means the speaker is glad he took the road he did; if it is the regret sigh, then the difference would not be good, and the speaker would be sighing in regret. But the plain fact is we do not know what that sigh is. Again, the speaker of the poem does not even know the nature of that sigh, because that sigh and his evaluation of the difference his choice will make are still in the future. It is a truism that any choice we make is going to make “all the difference” in how our future turns out.