1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
3 years ago
7

What is the difference between the cause and effect of an event in history

History
2 answers:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
8 0
Well the cause of a certain event in history will mean something happens.
The effect is the result of the event happening

For example. With 9/11 the cause was the twin towers collapsing. The effect would have been thousands of people dying as the result of the planes being highjacked
Luda [366]3 years ago
5 0
The cause of an event is something happened before the event.

The effect of an event is something happened after the event.

You'll have the 'cause' first, then the event will happen.

After the event happened, you will get the 'effects'.

Basically,
cause = why/how the event will happen?
effect = what changes the event brings to us?
You might be interested in
English kings granted colonial charters. A charter is most similar to A. religious freedom B. a corporation C. a license D. merc
seropon [69]

Answer:

C. A license.

Explanation:

The king is basically giving them a license to start a colony. It's like how you can't drive a car unless you have a drivers license, but with colonies.

Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) described the office of the president as a(n) _________, where presidents could use the
EleoNora [17]

Answer: C

Explanation: international platform

3 0
3 years ago
The Protestant and Catholic Reformations were alike
Sauron [17]
The protestant and Catholic reformation were alike E. In their emphasis on education.
4 0
3 years ago
Describe what the term Radical Republicans means. Do you agree that these people should
Roman55 [17]

Radical republicans are a faction of republicans who mostly favored repressive measures and aggressive towards the southern states during the civil war. They were mostly contradicted by the moderate and conservative republicans.

Explanation:

They are the faction of politicians who undertook aggressive and harsh measures against the southern states during the civil war. they believed that the confederate leaders were responsible for instigating the civil war and intended the confederate leaders to be punished. they also need the emancipation of the slaves and to make republic party in power in both north and south.

Radical republicans were  against the principles of emancipation declaration by Abraham Lincoln which was too lenient towards the south. This was in fact became the cause of the assassination of Lincoln. He was

8 0
3 years ago
Which of these policies does NOT apply to immigration from Mexico?
Luda [366]
The answer is going to be the Gentleman's Agreement. This agreement was between United States and the Empire of Japan, not Mexico.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain the role of the term “manifest destiny” in the expansion of the United States from 1818 to 1849.
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement about the India’s parliamentary system of government is correct?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these is a part of the “breadbasket” colonies?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the 13th person in office
    6·2 answers
  • History question HELP!!
    10·2 answers
  • What system of government is used in Britain?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Mexico refuse the Treaties of Velasco
    5·1 answer
  • What was taxed under Queen Hatshepsut’s reign?
    8·1 answer
  • Answers for the us history
    15·1 answer
  • How did states affect regional trade? Provide two examples of state interaction
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!