Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
Despite the fact that, gender differences in a dream content is well documented,<em> there is no relationship between agression content of dream and gender of the dreamer.</em>
Explanation:
In every dream, the content of the dream is based on so many factors. One of them is the gender of the dreamer. Most times, the males tend to have dreams than the female eventhough the content of the dream varies from one individual to another individual.
The agression content of the dreams is not depandent on the gender of the dreamer. Some females would have dream with high aggression content when compared with males and vis versa.
The discipline intercultural communication<span> studies </span>communication<span> across different cultures.</span>
According to Lustig and Koester, the five functions of nonverbal communication in relation to intercultural communication are <span>to accent, complement, contradict, regulate, or substitute for the verbal message.
</span>