Use true information that support your argument. After including true and accurate information support your fact with some commentary sentences, and at the end of your paper include a work cited page with links to where you found your factual information! hope this helps!
Answer:
A. The gods do not agree about who should win.
C. The gods can affect events on earth.
Explanation:
The given passage shows the scene from Homer's "The Illiad" where Zeus was debating whether he can keep his favorite Hektor alive despite the fates already deciding the outcome of the fight against Achilles. This scene is the fight scene between the two heroes before the Trojan War, right outside the fortified city of Troy.
Athene's reply to her father's dilemma of seeing Hektor die or saving him shows the disagreement among the gods over what Zeus might decide. Her comment that <em>"to bring back a man who is mortal, one long since doomed by his destiny, from ill-sounding death and release him"</em> is a supernatural, divine act which suggests the ability of the gods in affecting events on earth. But then, she also declared that <em>"not all the rest of us gods shall approve [him]",</em> suggesting how not all the gods will agree over who Zeus decide to make victorious.
Thus, the correct answers are options A and C.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be LITERARY FICTION. A sub-genre that is often concerned more with style and theme than with the plot is called literary fiction. Literary fiction is a kind of fiction that holds merit in the social world. Hope this answer helps.
It can be inferred that the disagreement in the excerpt most likely represents "different ways of responding to life’s hardships" (Option D).
<h3>
What is an inference?</h3>
Having examined rationally, the facts of a text or a story, the conclusion i s drawn afterward is what could be referred to as an inference.
Thus it is right to state that the inference from the excerpt most likely represents "different ways of responding to life’s hardships"
Learn more about inferences at;
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
Persuasive speeches are designed to convince the audience that a certain viewpoint is correct. In doing so, the speaker may utilize information.
Explanation:
Informative (or informational) and persuasive speaking are related, but distinct, types of speeches. The difference between the two lies in the speaker’s end goal and what the speaker wants the audience to leave with. Informative speeches are probably the most prevalent variety of speech. The goal is always to supply information and facts to the audience. This information can come in the form of statistics, facts, or other forms of evidence. Informational speeches do not tell people what to do with the information; their goal is for the audience to have and understand the information. Academic lectures are often informational speeches, because the professor is attempting to present facts so the students can understand them. Informational speeches may have a tendency to become overdrawn and boring. Their goal is not to excite the audience members, but rather to provide them with knowledge they did not have before the speech. Like informational speeches, persuasive speeches use information. However, persuasive speeches are designed for the audience to not only hear and understand the information, but to use it to be convinced of a viewpoint. The end goal of a persuasive speech is not for the audience to have information, but rather for them to have a certain view. Persuasive speeches may use some of the same techniques as informational speeches, but can also use emotions to convince the audience. A sales pitch is one example of a persuasive speech. A common cry against certain persuasive speeches is that they rely too much on emotion and not enough on facts. A persuasive speech that succeeds in convincing the audience to accept a view but is based on faulty or misleading information is unethical.