Answer:
Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.
Explanation:
B this is an obvious answer
It's true, Jesus used to tell stories to teach the people about God.
If I had to guess right, I think that I would choose "trade routes".
Why? The Ottomans were greedy people, they wanted both gold and wealth, so controlling trade routes would benefit their own economy.<span />
In 1933 the general unemployment rate in the United States was over 25 percent; and at the same time, unemployment rates for various American minorities ranged up to 50 percent or more. It existed a huge racial discrimination in almost every facet of daily life in America through the 1920s, it was hard for many minorities to distinguish much difference between the Great Depression and "normal" economic times. Nonetheless, for these groups the Great Depression was worse than "normal" economic hardships they had suffered. Something to highlight is that during this time it was really difficult to live, even for the white Americans and for the minorities was worse.
