1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrei [34K]
4 years ago
15

Explain why a group taking a vote on something is an example of direct democracy

Social Studies
2 answers:
Ainat [17]4 years ago
8 0

  The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.

  Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.

  The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.

  I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.

I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.

oksian1 [2.3K]4 years ago
7 0
Democracy is the "rule of the people" (from Greek: demos: people, ;Kratos: rule): so the group deciding all together (rather than one of them) is an example of democracy.

It's direct because everyone votes directly on something, rather than represented by someone else.
You might be interested in
7) The Federal Department of Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing coins money (prints our bills).
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

concurrent federal department of treasury

5 0
3 years ago
_______ children are children assumed to have been raised by animals in the wilderness, while _______ are children raised in orp
jeyben [28]

Answer: Feral, deprived

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
You hate to work with ignorant people. agree or disagree
nirvana33 [79]
My answer for this question would be AGREE. Yes, I don't like to work with ignorant people. Ignorance is a choice. Ignorance can be avoided when you have the eagerness to learn. Ignorance is like an excuse for those people who are lazy enough to learn and people like these are considered a liability. 
3 0
3 years ago
1. What was William Paterson's main contribution to the Constitutional Convention?
tankabanditka [31]

The main contribution of William Paterson  was to protect the rights as well as look after  the small states.

Explanation:

William Paterson was the person who started the New Jersey Plan. His main aim was to help the small states to protect their rights. According to this plan in the Congress each state must be having equal representative. He was not ready to accept the proportional representation because he always feared that the small states will be ignored their interest will not be given any priority.

As his proposal was not accepted so he made decision to leave the convention in the end of July but later returned in September when his proposal was accepted and he signed the constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
According to the ruling in the plassy v. ferguson case why was segregation acceptable
lesya692 [45]

Answer: In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jessie, an employee of kim’s restaurant, believes that her employer has violated her rights in the workplace. larson argues that
    5·1 answer
  • Raeshawn has learned all of his basic letter sounds and easily associates the sounds with their graphemes. When he looks at word
    10·1 answer
  • Marjoe had trained his dog that whenever it saw a photo of the cat next door, it would receive a treat. Through multiple pairing
    7·1 answer
  • Historians researching different aspects of the same period find different dates and events more significant . Why?
    5·1 answer
  • The diagram below shows features of the U.S. court system.
    10·2 answers
  • Commerce was a key mode of exchange between which of the following pairs of political entities?
    12·2 answers
  • How do DuBois’, Washington’s, and Terrell’s views on combating discrimination and racism differ?
    11·1 answer
  • What are fundamental rights??​
    7·1 answer
  • Producers must understand the marginal benefit of making an additional unit, which shows the
    8·1 answer
  • Neo-platonic thought reconciled the classical beliefs of ancient greece and rome with what disparate culture?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!