What type of vertical angle is typical of textbook illustrations versus product advertisements?

Can you think of any 2x2 matrices d for which cd = dc for all 2x2 matrices c? give 2 different examples of such matricesd.

Ksju [112]

For any arbitrary 2x2 matrices $\mathbf C$ and $\mathbf D$ , only one choice of $\mathbf D$ exists to satisfy $\mathbf{CD}=\mathbf{DC}$ , which is the identity matrix.

There is no other matrix that would work unless we place some more restrictions on $\mathbf C$ . One such restriction would be to ensure that $\mathbf C$ is not singular, or its determinant is non-zero. Then this matrix has an inverse, and taking $\mathbf D=\mathbf C^{-1}$ we'd get equality.

6 0

3 years ago

Which statement best explains the value of 16 − (−3)?

amm1812

Answer:

The additive inverse of −3 is +3, so 16 − (−3) = 19

negative 6 over 8 minus negative 1 over 8 = negative 5 over 8; therefore, the distance from A to B is absolute value of negative 5 over 8 equals negative 5 over 8 units

Because it is 3 units to the left of 2 on a horizontal number line

Step-by-step explanation:

The answers are the explanation.

Comment on the second question

Note that the second question asks for the distance from -6/8 to -1/8. Ordinarily, the distance from A to B would be computed as B - A. In this set of answer choices, it is computed as |A - B|. In the end, the result is the same.

Personally, I would compute the distance between points on a number line by subtracting the left point from the right point. Here, that would also correspond to B - A.

Comment on choosing 'word' answers

In a set of answers like these, one way to choose answers is simply to eliminate the ones that make a false statement. Often, you are left with only the correct answer choice.

For example, the statement "the additive inverse of -3 is -3" is a false statement, so the first two answer choices can be eliminated. Likewise, the statement 16 -(-3) = 13 is false, so that choice can be eliminated. The one remaining answer is the correct one.

have a good day hope this helped!

8 0

3 years ago

Natalie has $5000 and decides to put her money in the bank in an account that has a 10% interest rate that is compounded continu

kakasveta [241]

Step-by-step explanation:

Natalie has $5000

She decides to put her money in the bank in an account that has a 10% interest rate that is compounded continuously.

Part a) What type of exponential model is Natalie’s situation?

Answer:

As Natalie's situation implies

continuous compounding. So, instead of computing interest on a finite number of time periods, for instance monthly or yearly, continuous compounding computes interest assuming constant compounding over an infinite number of periods.

So, it requires the more generalized version of the principal calculation formula such as:

$P\left(t\right)=P_0\times \left[1+\left(i\:/\:n\right)\right]^{\left(n\:\times \:\:t\right)}$