It were be primarily a "monarchy" (usually an "absolute monarchy") in which <span>power is passed on to a family member after the king or queen's death, since in such systems it is believed that the royal family in question is "appointed" by God. </span>
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes because the King agreed to meet with some of the women and promised to distribute all the bread in Versailles to the crowd.
They were demanding bread for their families, after the march the king agreed to distribute bread to the crowd.
<span>JFK' wife - Jackie Kennedy. You can buy this kind of thing online nowdays.</span>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
The correct answer of the given question above would be the first option. The statement that describes Antitrust laws is that, it is created to prevent monopolies. The Antitrust laws <span>are rules that prevent the creation and behavior of monopolies. Hope this is the answer you are looking for. </span>
