Samuel Adams was agitated by the presence of regular soldiers in the town. He and the leading Sons of Liberty publicized accounts of the soldiers’ brutality toward the citizenry of Boston. On February 22, 1770 a dispute over non-importation boiled over into a riot. Ebenezer Richardson, a customs informer was under attack. He fired a warning shot into the crowd that had gathered outside of his home, and accidentally killed a young boy by the name of Christopher Sneider. Only a few weeks later, on March 5, 1770, a couple of brawls between rope makers on Gray’s ropewalk and a soldier looking for work, and a scuffle between an officer and a whig-maker’s apprentice, resulted in the Boston Massacre. In the years that followed, Adams did everything he could to keep the memory of the five Bostonians who were slain on King Street, and of the young boy, Christopher Sneider alive. He led an elaborate funeral procession to memorialize Sneider and the victims of the Boston Massacre. The memorials orchestrated by Samuel Adams, Dr. Joseph Warren, and Paul Revere reminded Bostonians of the unbridled authority which Parliament had exercised in the colonies. But more importantly, it kept the protest movement active at a time when Boston citizens were losing interest.
Answer:
All the answers are correct because research is multifaceted
Explanation:
While doing population studies, it is important to understand the population and they demographic, age, sex, location etc. This could have incredible effects on comparative studies.
It is also important to maintain an open line of communication to give instructions and follow up on the persons in the event that this kind of data is required. But like with population study the error that often comes into play is the element of human dishonesty. By keeping an open line of communication, the provisions can be made to keep this under check.
Finally, making sure that all the participants understand what is being asked of them is key to the open line of communication as not to create any misgivings or misunderstanding.
Answer:When George III refused to read the petition, many Americans realized that Parliament was acting with royal knowledge and support.
Explanation: because they he realized that they were acting with the parliament
