1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
3 years ago
11

Which statement is true of a parliamentary government but not a presidential government?

History
1 answer:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

d the head of government has little power over the legisture

You might be interested in
What nation did Texas break away from in the mid-1800's?
bekas [8.4K]
Texas broke away from Mexico in the Texas Revolution, which led to the Mexican-American War after that

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did pre-civil war immigrants differ from those who entered america between 1880 and 1920
Sidana [21]
Answer choices plz
312
6 0
4 years ago
A sentence should relate to : Sugar revolution, planters, capital As a result of the sugar revolution the lives of the Africans,
gogolik [260]

Answer:

sheeeeeeesh and im sorry i dint know

7 0
3 years ago
OMGGGGG PLZ HELPPPP!!! 60 points!!!
gladu [14]

Answer:

Isaiah 53:4-6 (5)

Explanation: Essay

Jesus said the volume of the book is written of Me. He also, after He was raised from the dead, that evening, He met two men on the road to Emmaus. It was then that the bible tells us that, beginning with Moses and the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the scriptures, Lk 24:27. That excites me! So I have focused my attention on the Old Testament, to find Jesus on every page; and usually as you find Jesus, you also find out God's plan and how it relates to us, the Church.  So I read the first verse in Hosea chapter 6, and I agree that He has healed us and I agree that He has bandaged us, but what does it mean that He has torn us or that He has wounded us? This just didn’t sit right with me. I don’t believe that God beats us up or causes or allows bad things to happen to us to teach us a lesson. Our God is a righteous God. And I understand that there has to be a judgement for sin. Sin cannot go unpunished. This is why Jesus came and paid the price for our sin on the cross. All the judgement and wrath of our sin was placed upon Him, “the chastisement of our peace was upon Him”, Isaiah 53:5. So when I come across a scripture like Hosea 6:1, that alludes to God beating us up, I always take a deeper look and usually find that there is a treasure buried there; as is the case in this verse.  Now with Old Testament events and prophecy, you must always look at it in two ways; the present sense and the foreshadowing implications of the future sense. The events and prophecy of the entire Old Testament was put in place for the one goal- to reconcile man with God. This was the plan before the foundation of the world. Before God even created man, He knew man would sin and He knew He would have to send His Son to us to be the reconciliation for that sin. Everything in the Old Testament points toward Jesus and is His plan for the reconciliation of man with God.  Now, in Hosea 6, Hosea is prophesying over Israel, because Nebuchadnezzar is going to bring Israel into exile, that is the present, practical look at this verse, but I am convinced that everything God does, He does on purpose and can be related as a type or foreshadowing on something yet future. So when the text says He has torn us and He has wounded us it made me pause. If you look at the text in the Septuagint translation, you will find that the word “torn” is a present tense verb in the indicative mood. This means that it is something that happened in the past and continues to have effects up to and including the present time. This Greek word is harpazo, which is the same word for the rapture or the catching away of the saints. Also, when you look closely, you will find that the word “us” isn’t even in the original text. The translators added this, but it really isn’t there. So now this starts to take on a whole new meaning. It wasn’t Israel who was torn away but someone else. Now if you study the word “wounded” this is a future tense verb. The translators wrote this as “has wounded”, but it should have been written “will be wounded” and again the “us” doesn’t even exist. Now let’s read this with this new information.  “Come let us return to the Lord, for He has been snatched away, but He will heal us. He will be wounded and He will bandage us”.  This now makes perfect sense. Hosea is talking about Jesus! Because of man’s sin, God could no longer fellowship with man. Sin was creating a barrier and it was as if God was snatched away from man. But He will heal us. He did this on the cross. From Hosea’s point of view, the cross was still future. We, as Christians look back at the cross and believe it happened. Sin, now, no longer is a barrier between God and man. Jesus was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and because of this He has bandaged us. Repaired and healed us with the Father. Reconciliation between God and man is why Jesus came and died on the cross. Jesus came to heal us. So when Isaiah 53:5 says “by His stripes we were healed”, now I look at this as our reconciliation with the Father. Jesus healed me of my sin and now I can have a personal relationship with Him because the barrier of sin has been removed.  I also believe healing in a physical sense is still available today, but I don’t think physical healing was the main purpose of Isaiah 53 and Hosea 6. Reconciliation with the Father was the main purpose and physical healing is a type and foreshadowing of that healing.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with believing that Jesus has healed our physical bodies. In fact God wants us to be made whole without sickness and disease. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing God for financial stability and the comfort of this physical world. But we have to be careful not to make the healing of our physical bodies and the comfort of this world the ultimate prize. Jesus is the prize and our focus should never turn from Him.

6 0
3 years ago
Where does the Supreme Court derive its power and authority?
tamaranim1 [39]

Option B is correct. The Supreme Court of the United States derives its power and authority from Article III, section I.

<h3>Which court has the most power?</h3>

In the United States, the supreme court is a superior court. Article III of the United States constitution grants the authority to establish a court and authorizes Congress to enact legislation establishing a system of lower courts.

Thus, the supreme court is a superior court, supreme court derives its power, and authority from Article III, section I.

Learn more about the Supreme Court here:

brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The significance of the first mass in the Philippines?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the Presidential election of 1860 important?
    10·1 answer
  • One of the most important technological innovations to influence the economy was the ______.
    6·2 answers
  • How might Chicago’s location affect its growth today?
    8·1 answer
  • What differences separated the Soviet Union from the United States in the
    15·1 answer
  • Consider the powers shared by the federal government and the states. Which is a concurrent?
    11·1 answer
  • How did nonviolent civil rights protesters meet resistance in the early 1960s?
    11·1 answer
  • Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative?
    11·1 answer
  • As Allied troops pushed east, describe the state of European cities after years of bombing
    12·1 answer
  • What was the impact of The Liberator?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!