There are different aspects to a story. The factors that makes this story interesting is that;
- The writing style is exciting, and the author uses precise words.
- The passage includes sensory details, such as what the narrator saw and heard.
- The passage makes it easy to decide how the narrator felt during the event.
- The event is told in a reasonable sequence.
There are different factors that can makes a story to be very interesting. Note that a good story is centered around something that the audience do decides if it is interesting or vital.
A great story is known to comprise of the use of storytelling to make important news more interesting and it is known to be more than just to inform but to also adds value to the related topic.
See full question below.
What makes this story interesting? Check all of the
boxes that apply.
The writing style is exciting, and the author uses precise words.
I was hiking on a crisp, clear autumn morning when a snake came slithering toward me. "It's probably just a garter Snake," I thought. As the snake slithered nearer, I spotted a rattle
b at the tip of its tail. I jumped back with a gasp.
The Snake was poisonous!
The passage includes sensory details, such as what the narrator saw and heard. The passage makes it easy to decide how the narrator felt during the event.
The event is told in a reasonable sequence.
Learn more about stories from
brainly.com/question/11728058
Know and learn more about your new school or program. It may help you meet more people.
The technique to improve internal validity is D) Addition of a control group.
<h3>What is
internal validity?</h3>
Internal validity serves as the study which bring about the establishment of a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship that can be found in treatment and an outcome.
it should be noted that Internal validity also helps to eliminate alternative explanations , hence, The technique to improve internal validity is D) Addition of a control group.
Learn more about internal validity on:
brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
COMPLETE QUESTOIN:
Which of the following is a technique to improve internal validity ____________?
A) Experimenter expectancy
B) Participant bias
C) Use of a confederate
D) Addition of a control group
I’m sorry I don’t know the answer I’m just trying to get enough questions to pass my final
Answer:
they ran out of money or they couldnt navigate? I'm sorry if im wrong
