Answer:
The correct option is B
Explanation:
The <u>biomolecule used in comparing lizards A and B is the mitochondrial DNA while that used to compare the same lizard B to another lizard C is the ribosomal RNA (rRNA)</u>. <u>They should have compared the same biomolecules throughout</u> by extracting the mitochondrial DNA of the three lizards and then proceed to sequence the whole genome of the lizards. After which they can now do a Global alignment (comparison) of the three sequences together. This procedure would have given them a more accurate information on there identity and similarity.
This helps by the production of more insulin, by inserting the insulin producing gene into the bacterium, which expresses and result in higher productions of insulin, which can be extracted, purified and used by the people having diabetes.
Answer:
The answer is option D "Succession rates would depend on the number of early arriving facilitator species"
Explanation:
Ecologists have a solid interest in knowing how communities structure and change over the long run. Indeed, they have invested a ton of energy seeing how complex communities, such as forests, emerge from void land or uncovered stone. They study, for instance, locales where volcanic eruptions, ice sheet retreats, or out of control fires have occurred, clearing land or uncovering rock.
In examining these destinations over the long haul, ecologists have seen steady cycles of progress in natural communities. As a rule, a community emerging in an upset territory experiences a succession of movements in synthesis, frequently throughout numerous years. This arrangement of changes is called natural succession.
Succession is a progression of reformist changes in the structure of an ecological community over the long run.
In primary succession, recently uncovered or recently shaped stone is colonized by living things unexpectedly.
In secondary succession, a territory recently involved by living things is upset then recolonized following the aggravation.
by cutting less trees, less of carbon monoxide producing objects, and less car usage unless demed nessary
Answer: They would be used for good to help others and the power would money?
Explanation: I want to help others & make the world a better place to live specifically the homeless or people with less money
