Answer:
Break-even point in units= 770
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Selling price= $500
Unitary variable cost= $260
Fixed costs= $184,800
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units using the mathematical equation, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Net income= unit contribution margin*x - fixed costs
x= number of units
0= (500 - 260)*x - 184,800
184,800/240 = x
770=x
<u>Now, under the unit contribution margin method:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
Break-even point in units= 184,800/240
Break-even point in units= 770
Answer:
b. $98,625.
Explanation:
Maintenance budget : $99,000
Assembly area: 43,000
Painting Area: 29,000
Maintenance budget allocated to assembly (M):
Administration budget : $79,00
Assembly employees: 150
Painting employees: 150
Administration budget allocated to assembly (A):
Therefore, the total amount of indirect factory expenses that should be allocated to the Assembly Department for the current period is:
Answer:
since the special order does not affect current normal sales, its analysis should only consider incremental expenses, not regular expenses:
A) Income statement without the special order
total revenue = $68 x 80,100 = $5,446,800
- COGS = ($2,446,880)
- Direct materials $897,120
- Direct labor $608,760
- Overhead $941,000
gross profit = $2,999,920
- SG&A = ($1,022,000)
- Selling exp. $559,000
- Administrative exp. $463,000
net income = $1,977,920
B) incremental revenue from special order = 14,900 x $63 = $938,700
incremental costs:
- direct materials = ($897,120 / 80,100 units) x 17,900 = $200,480
- direct labor = ($608,760 / 80,100 units) x 17,900 = $136,040
- overhead = ($658,700 / 80,100 units) x 17,900 = $147,200
- selling expenses = [($335,400 / 80,100 units) x 17,900] + ($2.70 x 17,900) = $74,952 + $48,330 = $123,282
- administrative expenses = $940
- total incremental costs = $607,942
incremental gain from special order = $938,700 - $607,942 = $330,758
Income statement with the special order
total revenue = $6,385,500
- COGS = ($2,930,600)
- Direct materials $1,097,600
- Direct labor $744,800
- Overhead $1,088,200
gross profit = $3,454,900
- SG&A = ($1,146,222)
- Selling exp. $682,282
- Administrative exp. $463,940
net income = $2,308,678
Answer:
Ultimately, economics is the study of choice. Because choices range over every imaginable aspect of human experience, so does economics. Economists have investigated the nature of family life, the arts, education, crime, sports, law—the list is virtually endless because so much of our lives involves making choices.
Answer:
B) Ricardian equivalence does not hold-people choose to spend the majority of the extra income they now take home.
Explanation:
According to the Ricardian equivalence, in this the consumer wants to enjoy the similar wealth all over the life due to which the deduction of the tax would not likely to rise the consumption of the consumers. They spent the similar amount. Also the consumer try to expect the loss arise in the future because of the tax rise and at the same time the government can increased the tax so that the loss i.e. spent would be balanced.
Now in the given situation if Ricardian equivalence grasp the income deduction so the consumption would not rise due to which the company can be within the recession
hence, the correct option is B.
