Answer:
True
Explanation:
Total unemployment is the addition of frictional, structural, and cyclical unemployment. If there is no cyclical unemployment, the economy is at its natural rate of unemployment, equal to the sum of frictional and structural unemployment. In this situation, because cyclical unemployment is 0.0%, the economy is at its natural rate of unemployment.
Also note the following :
Structural unemployment comes from a mismatch between the jobs available in some labor markets and the skills of workers. One factor which brings structural unemployment is institutional factors such as a minimum wage, which holds wages above the marginal productivity of less skilled workers, limiting their employment chances.
Frictional unemployment occurs because job seekers and employers will need some time to locate one another.
This kind of unemployment is usually brief.
Cyclical unemployment is the form of unemployment associated with business cycles. This kind of unemployment rises during recessions and falls during expansions. Because Janet seems jobless because of the recession, she would generally be considered to be cyclically unemployed.
Explanation:
They all have a cycle, and have something to do with money. The merchandisers promote the items, people sell them , and purchasers buy them. Simple.
Answer:
Elisha's basis in the partnership interest on December 31 is $339,525
Explanation:
In order to calculate Elisha's basis in the partnership interest on December 31 we would to calculate the following formula as follows:
Elisha’s basis=cash contributes + liability/2 +reported net income/2 + partnership borrowship/2 + partnership obligations/2=
Elisha’s basis= $227,520+ $151,680/2 + $35,550/2 + $23,700/2 + $9,480/2
Elisha’s basis=$339,525
Elisha's basis in the partnership interest on December 31 is $339,525
Answer:
The correct answer is no relationship.
Explanation:
As indicated by the question that the finding of the study is that the team size is not associated with the particular changes in the performance. In this context
Option A is not correct because the relation is positive linear when an increase in the team size resulted in a similar increase in the performance, which is not the case here.
Option B is not correct because the relation is negative linear when an increase in the team size resulted in a similar decrease in the performance, which is not the case here.
So option C is the correct answer.
Answer:
Annual depreciation= $20,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
cost= $180,000.
The tractor has an estimated salvage value of $20,000 and an estimated life of 8 years
<u>Under the straight-line depreciation method, the depreciation expense remains constant during the useful life. </u>We need to use the following formula:
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
Annual depreciation= (180,000 - 20,000)/8
Annual depreciation= $20,000