Answer:
$56,000 Adverse
Explanation:
direct materials quantity variance = Aq × Sp - Sq ×Sp
= (6,500×$16) - ((1,500×2)×$16)
= $104,000 - $48,000
= $56,000 Adverse
More materials were used during the month than was expected thus adverse.
<span>When two firms who do not participate in the same industries, for example a software company and a fast food restaurant company decide to merge, the result is called a conglomerate merger. A conglomerate merger is defined as two or more companies that come together to work together when they have absolutely no related things in common when in comes to their businesses. There are two types of conglomerate mergers, pure and mixed. In a pure conglomerate merger the businesses have nothing in common and just want to expand their business areas. A mixed conglomerate merger is when firms want to expand their product lines or target markets. </span>
The answer to the question above is "To maintain its liquidity if customers make demand whether its withdrawal or saving" based on the reserves meaning. A central bank holds the commercial banks excess of capital to maintain their liquidity. A bank will always have the liquidity risk to its business. This reserve is made to assure banks' liquidity.
Answer:
Clementine's sales volume variance = (BQ - AQS) x Standard profit margin
= (974 - 1,051) x ($95 - $49)
= $3,542(F)
Explanation: Sales volume variance is the difference between budgeted quantity and actual quantity sold multiplied by standard profit margin. Standard profit margin is the excess of budgeted selling price over actual selling price.
Answer:
B) Businesses can actually do very little in terms of social responsibility.
Explanation:
Milton Friedman is most famous for the defense of the Chicago School economics which is a neoclassical approach to macroeconomics. He favored free trade, smaller government and a slow but constant growth of the money supply. I personally disagree with neoclassical economists because they have the tendency to mess things up and time proves they are always wrong (that is a biased but positive statement). He was the father of monetarism, but if you look at his last two disciples, George Bush and George W. Bush, the outcome was not positive ⇒ 3 deep recessions in 3 presidential terms.
As a neoclassical economist, Friedman believed and argued in favor of the trickle down in economics. That means that if you allow the rich to get overwhelmingly rich, their riches will spill over to the rest of society. Not because they are good people that like to share their wealth, but because they need workers and employees to keep consuming goods and services in order to get the economy moving. Eventually the spilled over wealth should return to the top. So it is no wonder why he opposed corporate social responsibility, since wasting time and money in the community, employees or the environment was simply a waste of resources that could be used to increase stockholders' wealth.
I understand how theoretically this might work, but it takes the human factor out of the equation and expectations are extremely important in economics, that is why they always fail.
