Answer: B Wright wants to enhance the realism of the story for the audience.
Explanation:
Both claims have valid arguments, which make them strong.
Supporters of school gardens use statistical arguments that show how beneficial student participation in school gardens is. These statistical arguments show that research has been carried out where the data shows how good these activities are for students in their academic and personal lives, since it interferes even in their behavior. This can be seen in the lines "One of the strongest benefits [of School Gardens] is to social and emotional learning. Research shows that schools with a social and emotional learning program can increase test scores by 11% and positive classroom behavior by 9%. "
Opponents of school hostas also show strong arguments. They say that they are not against the existence of school gardens and that they do not want the end of them, but they are against the participation of students in this type of activity, because they believe that school gardens spend the time that students should be spending in academic activities and that would have more influence on their futures. This can be seen in the lines "Opponents say that no one wants gardens banned; they just don’t think school is the place for this type of learning."
Anyone please feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong but I'm sure of these (also wrote this in different order sorry):
perspective of story told- point of view
people or animal part of literary
work-characters
time and place-setting
message usually about life society... - theme
main problem of literary work - conflict
series of events - plot
conflict and suspense build- rising action
conflict and tension reach a peak - climax
conflict begins to be worked out and tension lessen - falling action
introduction and resolution are correct
Answer:
La gramática es correcta, si eso es lo que quieres decir.
The grammar is correct, if that is what you mean.
Explanation:
