Who do you think would have a problem with the pope proclaiming papal supremacy?

Drag each label to the correct location on the image. Match the thinkers with their ideas.

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

- Thomas Malthus--Predicted that population growth would far exceed the food supply.

- Adam Smith-- Stressed the idea that a free market needs to function without government interference.

- Robert Owen-- Proposed a society where workers are treated fairly and children are taught to read and write.

- Adam Smith-- Stated the “Invisible Hand” of the market would benefit both producers and consumers.

- Robert Owen-- Focused on providing education to children instead of letting them work in factories.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

why did the 1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance b

stepladder [879]

1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way

Explanation:

The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.

Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.

As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.

The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce Clause

The advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.

Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.

8 0

2 years ago

What made working conditions in factories dangerous during the first half of the nineteenth century?

Nitella [24]

B) limbs would get stuck into the machines. Therefore, resulting in loss of limbs. This happened alot and in addition, the environment wasn't so sanitary

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which organization came to dominate the Alliance movement in the 1890s?

drek231 [11]

Answer:

Farmers Alliance

Explanation:

By 1880 the Grange movement began to decline, replaced by the Farmers' Alliances. By 1890 the Alliance movements had members from New York to California totaling about 1.5 million. A parallel African-American organization, the Colored Farmers National Alliance, numbered over a million members

3 0

3 years ago

Can someone answer all of the following questions please!! Will mark branliest

Marrrta [24]

Ok, so I researched and these are the answers

European countries involved: Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, Great Britain, France, and the USA

Asian people involved: Japan, French Indochina(Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos.), Dutch East Indies( Indonesia), Portuguese Timor( Timor-Leste), Spanish East Indies( Philippines), British Burma( Myanmar), Borneo( Brunei, Two states of Singapore that are called Sabah and Sarawak, and the Malaysian federal territory of Labuan. ), and Malaya( Malay island, and Singapore)

Ways they resisted: Asian people were being poor because of the colonization. European powers took the economy in their hands. The people were furious. They protested, or attacked the military.

Outcomes: The European countries gave the countries to their people, and thus giving independence. They left it because, they can't handle the protests, Guerilla attacks, Skirmishes etc. Because of that, their economy started falling down too.

Hope this helps, and I'm sorry for the delay( My internet is not in good condition)

7 0

3 years ago