1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
4 years ago
11

In the Elizabethan great chain of being, which being was at the lowest rung of human society?

English
2 answers:
Veronika [31]4 years ago
4 0
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. the common man
babymother [125]4 years ago
3 0

In the Elizabethan great chain of being, the common man was at the lowest rung of human society.

According to the theory of the Great Chain of Beings, Elizabethans placed everything at some place in the chain of beings. The chain starts with the very basic element and ends to the Almighty God. God was placed on the highest place of the chain. Gods and spirits were permanent and were not subject of change so they were placed at the top. Earthly matters and people changed continuously because of which they were placed at the bottom. One can move a step towards the level of God if one does any spiritual deed.

You might be interested in
Need help on 10 and 11
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

10. C

11. A

Explanation:

A simile is a comparison of two objects or ideas using the words like or as. In question 10, the only answer that does this is C. And in question 11, the same applies (but with answer A).

6 0
3 years ago
Part 1
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

Wash didn't know what to do. He didn't want the students to be arrested. Arnetta on the other hand wanted to be arrested that same night but didn't. She went home instead to her parents. They both experienced the same thing but with different reactions.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the disagreement over the creation of the bank of the united states reflect the ideology differences that separated ham
Natalka [10]
« The Battle of Freeman’s FarmThe Nullification Crisis »Hamilton Vs. Jefferson

December 29, 2006 by Ando

I had intended to post Part II of the WWI question last night, but got caught up doing movie reviews on Life of Ando.  So to slake your ravenous historical thirst in the meantime, here is my assignment from my history class this past week.  If you’re really into American history and how the politics of the early Republic shook out, Jefferson vs. Hamilton is a great study.  It’s also a little, I guess comforting, to know that as bad as we think today’s politicians are,  politics was always a very dirty game.  Like Bismarck said, “Laws are like sausages.  Better to not see them being made.”  And as Ecclesiastes says, “There’s nothing new under the sun.”

1) How did the political philosophies of these men differ?

Most clear thinking Americans could probably tell you at least the rudimentary facts of who Thomas Jefferson was. Far fewer would likely have a definite idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what his contributions as a Founding Father were. Yet his conception of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both founders foresaw the new nation as a great future power, and both had very different maps of how to get it there.

Jefferson believed the nation’s strength lay in its agricultural roots. He favored an agrarian nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was very opposed to a strong central authority and believed that the people were the final authority in government. Jefferson also encouraged active support for the French Revolution

Hamilton favored a strong central authority. He believed a strong government was necessary to provide order so that business and industry could grow. He envisioned America becoming an industrial power. To this end he sought to establish a national bank and fund the national debt in order to establish firm base for national credit. Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” He opposed involvement in the French Revolution and worried Jeffersonians by appearing, and maybe even being, too cozy with Britain.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Types of things vs. types of thing
diamong [38]
♥ Types of things<span> 
</span><span>The reason for this is because when saying Types as a plural, you can also say things as a plural, it makes much more sense and its pronounced correctly </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which sentence below is a subjective description?
maksim [4K]
Well, the answer is definitely not B, in choice A, wiry gives a slightly negative emotion. I think it's fair game for either C or D. You should wait for someone else to either say just C or just D.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the meaning of the root word fer? see bring or carry stretch do or make
    11·2 answers
  • William faulkner suggests, ‘read, read, read. read everything -- trash, classics, good and bad, and see how they do it. just lik
    7·1 answer
  • I need help with comparing and contrasting The Cat and the Moon and The Golden Cat
    9·1 answer
  • Which book would provide the MOST information for someone researching sabre-tooth tigers?
    7·2 answers
  • What does the<br> Marigolds symbolize to Elizabeth
    12·1 answer
  • Rewrite the following sentence so that it contains vivid images and precise words.
    12·1 answer
  • What proves that mr Bamjee is dependent on his wife
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best integrates the ideas from the text with the information provided in the images?
    12·1 answer
  • Make a sentences using these words
    12·1 answer
  • Consider what
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!