All categories

3 years ago

Right now the number 33 and 89 to estimate their sum

1 answer:

ozzi3 years ago

4 0

Addition, you can have 89 + 33 = 122 
Commutative Property by moving: 33 + 89 = 122
Associative Property by grouping: (3 + 30) + (80 + 9 ) = 122 
Distributive Property by allotting: 10 (8.9) + 33 = 113 

 Other examples include:
Addition, you can have 33 + = 113 
Commutative Property by moving: 107 + 6 = 113 
Associative Property by grouping: (3 + 3) + (100 + 7 ) = 113 
Distributive Property by allotting: 2 (3) + 107 = 113 

Multiplication, you can have 6 x 107 = 642 
Commutative Property by moving: 107 x 6 = 642 
Associative Property by grouping: (3 + 3) x (100 + 7 ) = 642 
Distributive Property by allotting: 2(3) x 107 = 642

You might be interested in

For each of the following, use logic laws to decide whether the statement is a tautology contradiction, or neither. a (a) (A B)

spayn [35]

Answer:

The statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

The statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

Step-by-step explanation:

A tautology is a proposition that is always true.

A contradiction is a proposition that is always false.

A contingency is a proposition that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction.

a) To classify the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A) \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot A \lor\lnot B)\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv (\lnot B\lor \lnot A )\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (\lnot A \land A)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (A \land \lnot A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

b) To classify the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)\land P$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv P \land (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv (P \land \lnot P) \lor (P \land \lnot P)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv F \lor F \equiv F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

8 0

3 years ago

Multiply. (−7.3)(−0.08) Enter your answer in the box.

BARSIC [14]

Answer:

$0.584$

Step-by-step explanation:

A negative number times a negative number is a positive.

Hope this helps you!

$GraceRosalia$ is here to help

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ginnie plans to paint a wall. She measures its height and width. She finds that she needs enough paint to cover 8 square meters.

SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

The 8 square meters represent the product of the height by the width of the wall and therefore, its area.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ginnie is going to paint a wall and measures the height and the width, the walls are usually in the form of a rectangle or square. To find the area of both we need to multiply the height by the width (in the case of the square both are the same) and this will give us the total amount of paint that we need to paint the wall.

In this example, Ginnie finds that she needs enough paint to cover 8 square meters, therefore, these 8 square meters represent the product of the height by the width (that we don't know but it doesn't matter) of the wall and therefore, its area.

7 0

3 years ago

If the radius of a circle is increased by 100%, then the area is increased by:

shtirl [24]

$A_1=\pi r^2\\\\R=2r\ then\ A_2=\pi R^2\to A_2=\pi(2r)^2=4\pi r^2\\\\A_2-A_1=4\pi r^2-\pi r^2=3\pi r^2=3A_1\\\\3=300\%\\\\Answer:(C).$