1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
11

Is Fidel Castro good or bad? I have always heard there is very poor things in Cuba. Is Castro the reason why there is little mon

ey and stores that sometimes do not have things in them, and if not that why is he known to be bad?
Social Studies
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
5 0
He is BAD. hewas a communist dictator of cuba in 1963. the us and cuba almost went to nuclear war
You might be interested in
Is assimilation of others into another culture ever justified?
lesya692 [45]
Yes because at a certain point they passed a bill which gave everyone equality
5 0
3 years ago
Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed has been a major supporter of the plan to deepen the Savannah Seaport. When funding was approved for th
Daniel [21]

Answer: D) He believes more port activity would be good for Atlanta's business, too.

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed states in this passage that his reason for supporting the plan to deepen the Savannah Seaport is that he believes it will bring economic benefits to the entire state of Georgia. Therefore, it is likely he believes that more port activity would benefit Atlanta as well.

8 0
3 years ago
What has to happen in congress before the president can be impeached?
DanielleElmas [232]
The House of Representatives must draw up and vote on Articles of Impeachment. The Articles will outline the charges, and a vote in favor will declare the President impeached. A vote against drops the charges.
5 0
3 years ago
What did Slave owning states believe about state's rights?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Rallying Cry of Secession

The appeal to state's rights is of the most potent symbols of the American Civil War, but confusion abounds as to the historical and present meaning of this federalist principle.

The concept of states' rights had been an old idea by 1860. The original thirteen colonies in America in the 1700s, separated from the mother country in Europe by a vast ocean, were use to making many of their own decisions and ignoring quite a few of the rules imposed on them from abroad. During the American Revolution, the founding fathers were forced to compromise with the states to ensure ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a united country. In fact, the original Constitution banned slavery, but Virginia would not accept it; and Massachusetts would not ratify the document without a Bill of Rights.

Secession Speeches

South Carolinians crowd into the streets of Charleston in 1860 to hear speeches promoting secession.

The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became heated again in the 1820s and 1830s fueled by the divisive issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories forming as the nation expanded westward.

The Missouri Compromise in 1820 tried to solve the problem but succeeded only temporarily. (It established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36º30' as slave and north of the line—except Missouri—as free.) Abolitionist groups sprang up in the North, making Southerners feel that their way of life was under attack. A violent slave revolt in 1831 in Virginia, Nat Turner’s Rebellion, forced the South to close ranks against criticism out of fear for their lives. They began to argue that slavery was not only necessary, but in fact, it was a positive good.

As the North and the South became more and more different, their goals and desires also separated. Arguments over national policy grew even fiercer. The North’s economic progress as the Southern economy began to stall fueled the fires of resentment. By the 1840s and 1850s, North and South had each evolved extreme positions that had as much to do with serving their own political interests as with the morality of slavery.

As long as there were an equal number of slave-holding states in the South as non-slave-holding states in the North, the two regions had even representation in the Senate and neither could dictate to the other. However, each new territory that applied for statehood threatened to upset this balance of power. Southerners consistently argued for states rights and a weak federal government but it was not until the 1850s that they raised the issue of secession. Southerners argued that, having ratified the Constitution and having agreed to join the new nation in the late 1780s, they retained the power to cancel the agreement and they threatened to do just that unless, as South Carolinian John C. Calhoun put it, the Senate passed a constitutional amendment to give back to the South “the power she possessed of protecting herself before the equilibrium of the two sections was destroyed.”

Controversial—but peaceful—attempts at a solution included legal compromises, arguments, and debates such as the Wilmot Proviso in 1846, Senator Lewis Cass’ idea of popular sovereignty in the late 1840s, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, and the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. However well-meaning, Southerners felt that the laws favored the Northern economy and were designed to slowly stifle the South out of existence. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was one of the only pieces of legislation clearly in favor of the South. It meant that Northerners in free states were obligated, regardless of their feelings towards slavery, to turn escaped slaves who had made it North back over to their Southern masters. Northerners strongly resented the law and it was one of the inspirations for the publishing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852.

6 0
3 years ago
Help plsss<br> Bo Pesants and Catoles aperienced
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

is this a book ? please give more information! thank you

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In his presentation hassan says let me review the three steps in filing a health benefits claim. what verbal signpost is he usin
    7·1 answer
  • Provident medical health center asks its employees, many of which are members of the american nurses association, to apply the u
    14·1 answer
  • The avoiding style of conflict resolution is based on a _____ degree of assertiveness and a _____ degree of cooperativeness.
    15·1 answer
  • What forces led Americans to Declare war on Britain in 1812?
    6·1 answer
  • Netflix Recommendations? I like greys, the umbrella academy, and Jane the Virgin. So anything like that please.
    5·2 answers
  • STIs including HIV and AIDS.
    13·1 answer
  • Who else has strict parents :(
    14·2 answers
  • What change did Governor Claiborne make to the Louisiana parish system?
    10·1 answer
  • Kyle was so confident about his mathematical skills that he failed to study enough for his final math test to get a passing cour
    7·1 answer
  • How could the manufacturing sector utilize Extended Reality?.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!