1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
10

Between the Colonizers and the Colonized,

History
2 answers:
Yuki888 [10]3 years ago
8 0
1. Colonizers were people who wanted land for its resources and didn't care much about the people. The people were just in their way of getting wealth and being powerful in Europe.  The colonists who were on the land were forced to work and trade with the colonizing country in order to make them richer.

2. Colonizers believed that people in colonies were more or less expendable and that they were often uneducated lower class and that they had the right to colonize them and introduce a civilization. Colonists wanted to be respected and to be free in the colonies and have their own sovereignty since they lived in the area.

3. Acquiring power was done through direct conquering, like sending military to take an area, or by trading and getting people to earn money which would provide them with political power, or by negotiating with locals who would give their land. Resisting power was difficult and people had to organize things like riots or protests or share propaganda among people in order to get them to join their cause.
nevsk [136]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1. Colonizers were people who wanted land for its resources and didn't care much about the people. The people were just in their way of getting wealth and being powerful in Europe.  The colonists who were on the land were forced to work and trade with the colonizing country in order to make them richer.

2. Colonizers believed that people in colonies were more or less expendable and that they were often uneducated lower class and that they had the right to colonize them and introduce a civilization. Colonists wanted to be respected and to be free in the colonies and have their own sovereignty since they lived in the area.

3. Acquiring power was done through direct conquering, like sending military to take an area, or by trading and getting people to earn money which would provide them with political power, or by negotiating with locals who would give their land. Resisting power was difficult and people had to organize things like riots or protests or share propaganda among people in order to get them to join their cause.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9046562#readmore

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When did hip-hop and rap originate?
frutty [35]

Answer:

the 1970s time

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Allisa [31]

Hello There !

The answer is...

B. Northeast

Hopefully, this helps you!!

AnimeVines

3 0
2 years ago
When and how is it beneficial for the United States to intervene in
Vanyuwa [196]

The United States and all other countries should intervene in international conflicts when there are uprising and threats to world peace. The questions “why, when and how” should be done to decide when an intervention is necessary.

The consequences of the last US intervention created resentment, the threat of terror resulted in costly interventions, causing the spent of billion of dollars internally and externally defending and protecting other nations.

There was an increase of wiretapping, surveillance of civilians, intrusive body searches at security points., this turned the US into a national security state.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the stamp act and the sugar act
Mnenie [13.5K]
The Stamp Act put a law stating taxes (stamps) had to be put on every article item, from newspapers to a deck of cards to a marriage document.

However, the Sugar Act put a law stating taxes had to be put on imports such as sugar and molasses instead. Additional goods were also taxed such as coffee.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the Atlantic slave trade different in the 1400s and 1500s than it was in the 1600s?
Rufina [12.5K]
<span>The Altantic Slave Trade was different in the 1400's and 1500's than it was in the 1600's, because b) In the 1400's and 1500's, more slaves were sold to the Middle East than across the Atlantic. In the 1600's, more slaves were sold across the Atlantic. This practice was very common in the Middle East, before the Europeans took it up.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Prince Federic supported Martin Luther because he ?
    5·1 answer
  • In 1804, the 12th amendment changed the way the united states
    6·1 answer
  • Two million years ago, the first stone tools enabled our ancestors to
    6·2 answers
  • How might modern developments have changed trade routes through Arabia since 500s
    12·1 answer
  • What was a major characteristics of the renassisnce in Europe?
    11·1 answer
  • François Mitterand was a French:
    12·1 answer
  • What year was the united nations founded
    5·2 answers
  • The word "plurality" means ___.
    8·1 answer
  • Ano ang tradisyon at kaugalian ng mga Tsino sa kabihasnan​
    6·1 answer
  • Why were westward migration and agricultural improvement so widespread in
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!