Freedom! Woooooohoooooooooo
I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
Answer:
I would prob go with housing
Explanation:
Henry Ford first used what was common in other industrial factories in his own. He created a perfect assembly line where a car was manufactured in just under 90 minutes instead of the usual 13 hours. This perfection in manufacturing meant that no time was to go wasted, this meant that workers were a psrt of a single aspect in the assembly line instead of doing 2 or 3 jobs within production. He created a complex system of trolleys and slides that helped with this purpose of maximizing efficiency. The mass production meant that they could sell more cars and keep their prices down and increasing profits at the same time. He created cars not only with mass production in mind but also with mass consumption. Henry Ford wanted everybody to own a car, not just the little upper rich class.
